ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Readability formulas in the new millennium: what's the use?
Full text PdfPdf (160 KB)
Source ACM Journal of Computer Documentation (JCD) archive
Volume 24 ,  Issue 3  (August 2000) table of contents
Pages: 138 - 140  
Year of Publication: 2000
ISSN:1527-6805
Author
Karen A. Schriver  KSA Document Design & Research, Inc., Oakmont, PA
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 14,   Downloads (12 Months): 82,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/344599.344638
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

While readability formulas were intended as a quick benchmark for indexing readabilty, they are inherently unreliable: they depend on criterion (calibration) passages too short to reflect cohesiveness, too varied to support between-formula comparisons, and too text-oriented to account for the effects of lists, enumerated sequences,and tables on text comprehension. But readability formulas did spark decades of research on what comprehension really involoves.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Davison, A. (1984). Readability--Appraising text difficulty. In R. C. Anderson, J. Osborn, and R. J. Tierney (eds.), Learning to read in American schools: Basal readers and content texts (pp. 121-151). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
 
2
Duffy, T. M. and Kabance, P. (1982). Testing a readable approach to text revision. Journal of Educational Psychology. 74, 733-748.
 
3
Duffy, T. M. (1985). Readability formulas: What's the use? In T. M. Dully and R. Waller (eds.), Designing usable texts (pp. 113-143). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
 
4
Harrison, C. (1980). Readability in the classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
 
5
Klare, George R. (1984). Readability. In P. D Pearson, R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, and P. Mosenthal (eds.). Handbook odCreading research (pp. 681-744). NY: Longman.
 
6
Rothkopf, Ernest Z. (1985). Writing to teach and reading to learn: A perspective on the psychology of written instruction. In H. Singer and R. B. Ruddell (eds.), Theoretical models and processes odCreading, 3~J ed. (pp. 879-907). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
 
7
Schriver, K. A. (1989). Evaluating the quality of text: The continuum from text-focused to reader-focused methods. IF, JEff Transactions in Professional Communication, 32 (4), 238-255.
 
8
 
9
Selzer, J. (1981). Readability is a four-letter word. Journal of Business Communication, 18, 23-34.