ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Engineering authority and trust in cyberspace: the OM-AM and RBAC way
Full text PdfPdf (728 KB)
Source Symposium on Access Control Models and Technologies archive
Proceedings of the fifth ACM workshop on Role-based access control table of contents
Berlin, Germany
Pages: 111 - 119  
Year of Publication: 2000
ISBN:1-58113-259-X
Author
Ravi Sandhu  ISE Department, MS 4A4, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA
Sponsor
SIGSAC: ACM Special Interest Group on Security, Audit, and Control
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 1,   Downloads (12 Months): 22,   Citation Count: 13
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/344287.344309
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Information systems of the future will be large-scale, highly decentralized, pervasive, span organizational boundaries and evolve rapidly. Effective security in this cyberspace will require engineering authority and trust retationships across organizations and individuals. In this paper we propose the four-layer OM-AM framework for this purpose. OM-AM comprises objective, model, architecture and mechanism layers in this sequence. The objective and model (OM) layers articulate whatthe security objective and tradeoffs are, while the architecture and mechanism (AM) layers address howto meet these requirements. The hyphen in OM-AM emphasizes the shift from what to how. These layers are roughly analogous to a network protocol stack with a many-to-many relationship between successive layers, and most certainly do not imply a top-down waterfall-style software engineering process. OM-AM is an excellent match to the policy-neutral and flexible nature of role-based access control (RBAC). This paper describes and motivates the OM-AM framework and presents a case study in applying it in a distributed RBAC application.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
Dep85
Department of Defense National Computer Security Center. Department of Defense Trusted Computer Systems Evaluation Criteria, December 1985. DoD 5200.28-STD.
 
Dep91
Department of Defense National Computer Security Center. Trusted Database Interpretation of the Trusted Computer Systems Evaluation Criteria, April 1991. NCSC-TG- 021.
FBK99
 
FCK95
David Ferraiolo, Janet Cugini, and Richard Kuhn. Role-based access control (RBAC): Features and motivations. In Proceedings o} 11th Annual Computer Security Application Conferenee, pages 241-48, New Orleans, LA, December 11-15 1995.
 
FK92
David Ferraiolo and Richard Kuhn. Rolebased access controls. In Proceedings o} 15th NIST-NCSC National Computer Security Conference, pages 554-563, Baltimore, MD, October 13-16 1992.
 
Gui95
Luigi Guiri. A new model for role-based access control. In Proceedings of 11th Annual Computer Security Application Conference, pages 249-255, New Orleans, LA, December 11-15 1995.
LCC+75
 
McL94
J. McLean. Security models. In John Marciniak, editor, Encyclopedia of Software Engineering. Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1994.
 
NO95
NO99
 
Not94
LouAnna Notargiacomo. Architectures for MLS database management systems. In M. Abrams, S. Jajodia, and H. Podell, editors, Information Security : An Integrated Collection of Essays. IEEE Computer Society Press, 1994.
OSM00
 
PS99
Joon Park and Ravi Sandhu. Smart certificates: Extending x.509 for secure attribute services on the web. In Proceedings of 22nd NIST-NCSC National Inforrnation Systems Security Conference, Arlington, VA, October 18-21 1999.
 
PSG00
 
RS98
Chandramouli Ramaswamy and Ravi Sandhu. Role-based access control features in commercial database management systems. In Proceedings of 21st NIST-NCSC National Inforrnation Systems Security Conference, pages 503-511, Arlington, VA, October 5-8 1998.
 
SA98a
Ravi Sandhu and Gail-Joon Ahn. Decentralized group hieraches in unix: An experiment and lessons learned. In Proceedings of 21st NIST-NCSC National Inforrnation Systems Security Conference, Arlington, VA, October 5-8 1998.
 
SA98b
Ravi Sandhu and Gail-Joon Ahn. Group hierarchies with decentralized user assignment in Windows NT. In Proc. International Association of Science and Technology for Development (IASTED) Conference on Software Engineering, Las Vegas, Nevada, October 1998.
Sal74
 
San93
 
San96
San98a
 
San98b
Ravi Sandhu. Role-based access control. In Zelkowitz, editor, Advances in Computers, Volume: 46. Academic Press, 1998.
 
SB99
Ravi Sandhu and Venkata Bhamidipati. Role-based administration of user-role assignment: The URA97 model and its Oracle implementation. The Journal of Computer Security, 1999. in press.
SBM99
 
SCFY96
SM98
SP98
 
TDH92
 
ZSS99
M. Zurko, R. Simon, and T. Sanfilippo. A user-centered modular authorization service built on an rbac foundation. In Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on Research in Security and Privacy, pages 57-71, Oakland, CA, May 1999.

CITED BY  13