ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
The generalized boundary curve — a common method for automatic nominal design centering of analog circuits
Full text Publisher SitePublisher Site PdfPdf (110 KB)
Source Design, Automation, and Test in Europe archive
Proceedings of the conference on Design, automation and test in Europe table of contents
Paris, France
Pages: 42 - 47  
Year of Publication: 2000
ISBN:1-58113-244-1
Authors
R. Schwencker  Institute of Electronic Design Automation, Technical University of Munich, 81609 Munich, Germany and Infineon Technologies, P.O. Box 80 09 49, 81617 Munich, Germany
F. Schenkel  Institute of Electronic Design Automation, Technical University of Munich, 81609 Munich, Germany
H. Graeb  Institute of Electronic Design Automation, Technical University of Munich, 81609 Munich, Germany
K. Antreich  Institute of Electronic Design Automation, Technical University of Munich, 81609 Munich, Germany
Sponsors
EDAA : European Design Automation Association
SIGDA: ACM Special Interest Group on Design Automation
ECSI :
RAS : RAS
EDAC : Electronic Design Automation Consortium
IEEE-CS : Computer Society
IFIP : International Federation for Information Processing
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2,   Downloads (12 Months): 13,   Citation Count: 3
Additional Information:

references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/343647.343695
What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
H. Abdel-Malek and A. Hassan. The ellipsoidal technique for design centering and region approximation. IEEE Trans. on CAD, 10:1006-1013, 1991.
 
2
K. Antreich, H. Graeb, and C. Wieser. Circuit analysis and optimization driven by worst-case distances. IEEE Trans. on CAD, 13(1):57-71, 1994.
 
3
J. Bandler and S. Chen. Circuit optimization: The state of the art. IEEE Trans. on Microwaves Theory Techniques (MTT), 36:424-442, 1988.
 
4
A. R. Conn, E K. Coulman, R. A. Haring, G. L. Morill, C. Visweswariah, and C. W. Wu. JiffyTune: Circuit optimization using time-domain sensitivities. IEEE Trans. on CAD, 17(12):1292-1309, Dec. 1998.
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
K. Eshbaugh. Generation of correlated parameters for statistical circuit simulation. IEEE Trans. on CAD, 11:1198- 1206, 1992.
 
9
U. Feldmann, U. Wever, Q. Zheng, R. Schultz, and H. Wriedt. Algorithms for modern circuit simulation. Archiv fiir Elektronik und lTbertragungstechnik (AEIT), 46:274- 285, 1992.
 
10
M. Krasnicki, R. Phelps, R. A. Rutenbar, and L. R. Carley. MAELSTROM: Efficient simulation-based synthesis for custom analog cells. 1999.
 
11
K. Krishna and S. Director. The linearized performance penalty (LPP) method for optimization of parametric yield and its reliability. IEEE Trans. on CAD, 14(12):1557-1568, Dec. 1995.
 
12
 
13
M. D. Meehan and J. Purviance. Yield and Reliablility in Microwave Circuit and System Design. Artech House Boston/London, 1993.
 
14
E.S. Ochotta, R. A. Rutenbar, and L. R. Carley. Synthesis of high-performance analog circuits in ASTRX/OBLX. IEEE Trans. on CAD, 15(3):273-294, March 1996.
 
15
R. Schwencker. Automatic design centering of analog integrated circuits based on the generalized boundary curve of multiple robustness objectives. Technical Report TUM- LEA-99-1, Technical University Munich, 1999.
16
 
17
J. C. Zhang and M. A. Styblinski. Yield and Variability Optimization of Integrated Circuits. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1995.
 
18
S. Zizala, J. Eckmueller, and H. Graeb. Fast calculation of analog circuits' feasibility regions by low level functional measures. In IEEE Int. Conf. on Electronics, Circuits and Systems, pages 85-88, Sept. 1998.


Collaborative Colleagues:
R. Schwencker: colleagues
F. Schenkel: colleagues
H. Graeb: colleagues
K. Antreich: colleagues