| Indulgent algorithms (preliminary version) |
| Full text |
Pdf
(1.06 MB)
|
| Source
|
Annual ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing
archive
Proceedings of the nineteenth annual ACM symposium on Principles of distributed computing
table of contents
Portland, Oregon, United States
Pages: 289 - 297
Year of Publication: 2000
ISBN:1-58113-183-6
|
|
Author
|
|
Rachid Guerraoui
|
Communication Systems Department, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, CH 1015 Lausanne
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6, Downloads (12 Months): 18, Citation Count: 19
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
Informally, an indulgent algorithm is a distributed algorithm that tolerates unreliable failure detection: the algorithm is indulgent towards its failure detector. This paper formally characterises such algorithms and states some of their interesting features. We show that indulgent algorithms are inherently safe and uniform. We also state impossibility results for indulgent solutions to divergent problems like consensus, and failure-sensitive problems like non-blocking atomic commit and terminating reliable broadcast.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
|
 |
2
|
|
 |
3
|
|
| |
4
|
F. Cristian and C. Fetzer. The Timed Asynchronous System Model Technical Report, CSE 97-519, University of California at Saint Diego, 1997.
|
| |
5
|
|
 |
6
|
|
 |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
|
| |
9
|
|
| |
10
|
|
 |
11
|
|
 |
12
|
|
| |
13
|
|
| |
15
|
|
| |
16
|
|
 |
17
|
|
CITED BY 19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Idit Keidar , Alexander Shraer, Timeliness, failure-detectors, and consensus performance, Proceedings of the twenty-fifth annual ACM symposium on Principles of distributed computing, July 23-26, 2006, Denver, Colorado, USA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|