Influence sets based on reverse nearest neighbor queries

ABSTRACT

Inherent in the operation of many decision support and continuous referral systems is the notion of the “influence” of a data point on the database. This notion arises in examples such as finding the set of customers affected by the opening of a new store outlet location, notifying the subset of subscribers to a digital library who will find a newly added document most relevant, etc. Standard approaches to determining the influence set of a data point involve range searching and nearest neighbor queries.

In this paper, we formalize a novel notion of influence based on reverse neighbor queries and its variants. Since the nearest neighbor relation is not symmetric, the set of points that are closest to a query point (i.e., the nearest neighbors) differs from the set of points that have the query point as their nearest neighbor (called the reverse nearest neighbors). Influence sets based on reverse nearest neighbor (RNN) queries seem to capture the intuitive notion of influence from our motivating examples.

We present a general approach for solving RNN queries and an efficient R-tree based method for large data sets, based on this approach. Although the RNN query appears to be natural, it has not been studied previously. RNN queries are of independent interest, and as such should be part of the suite of available queries for processing spatial and multimedia data. In our experiments with real geographical data, the proposed method appears to scale logarithmically, whereas straightforward sequential scan scales linearly. Our experimental study also shows that approaches based on range searching or nearest neighbors are ineffective at finding influence sets of our interest.

REFERENCES

• 1: Pankaj K. Agarwal, Range searching, Handbook of discrete and computational geometry, CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL, 1997
• 2: Norbert Beckmann , Hans-Peter Kriegel , Ralf Schneider , Bernhard Seeger, The R*-tree: an efficient and robust access method for points and rectangles, Proceedings of the 1990 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data, p.322-331, May 23-26, 1990, Atlantic City, New Jersey, United States
• 3: Thomas Brinkhoff , Hans-Peter Kriegel , Bernhard Seeger, Efficient processing of spatial joins using R-trees, Proceedings of the 1993 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data, p.237-246, May 25-28, 1993, Washington, D.C., United States
• 4: B. Chazelle and L. J. Guibas. Fractional cascading: I. A data structuring technique. Algorithmica, 1:133-162, 1986.
• 5: K. Fukunaga and P. M. Narendra. A branch and bound algorithm for computing k-nearest neighbors. IEEE Trans. on Computers (TOC), C- 24(7):750-753, July 1975.
• 6: Volker Gaede , Oliver Günther, Multidimensional access methods, ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), v.30 n.2, p.170-231, June 1998 [doi>10.1145/280277.280279]
• 7: Antonin Guttman, R-trees: a dynamic index structure for spatial searching, Proceedings of the 1984 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data, June 18-21, 1984, Boston, Massachusetts
• 8: Gísli R. Hjaltason , Hanan Samet, Incremental distance join algorithms for spatial databases, Proceedings of the 1998 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data, p.237-248, June 01-04, 1998, Seattle, Washington, United States
• 9: Gísli R. Hjaltason , Hanan Samet, Distance browsing in spatial databases, ACM Transactions on Database Systems (TODS), v.24 n.2, p.265-318, June 1999 [doi>10.1145/320248.320255]
• 10: Kamal Jain , Vijay V. Vazirani, Primal-Dual Approximation Algorithms for Metric Facility Location and k-Median Problems, Proceedings of the 40th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, p.2, October 17-18, 1999
• 11: D. G. Kirkpatrick. Optimal search in planar subdivisions. SIAM J. Comput., 12:28-35, 1983.
• 12: Flip Korn , Nikolaos Sidiropoulos , Christos Faloutsos , Eliot Siegel , Zenon Protopapas, Fast Nearest Neighbor Search in Medical Image Databases, Proceedings of the 22th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, p.215-226, September 03-06, 1996
• 13: Bernd-Uwe Pagel , Hans-Werner Six , Heinrich Toben , Peter Widmayer, Towards an analysis of range query performance in spatial data structures, Proceedings of the twelfth ACM SIGACT-SIGMOD-SIGART symposium on Principles of database systems, p.214-221, May 25-28, 1993, Washington, D.C., United States [doi>10.1145/153850.153878]
• 14: Madhukar R. Korupolu , C. Greg Plaxton , Rajmohan Rajaraman, Analysis of a local search heuristic for facility location problems, Proceedings of the ninth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms, p.1-10, January 25-27, 1998, San Francisco, California, United States
• 15: Nick Roussopoulos , Stephen Kelley , Frédéric Vincent, Nearest neighbor queries, Proceedings of the 1995 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data, p.71-79, May 22-25, 1995, San Jose, California, United States
• 16: Timos K. Sellis , Nick Roussopoulos , Christos Faloutsos, The R+-Tree: A Dynamic Index for Multi-Dimensional Objects, Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, p.507-518, September 01-04, 1987
• 17: M. Staid. Closest point problems in computational geometry. In J.-R. Sack and J. Urrutia, editors, Handbook on Computational Geometry. Elsevier Science Publishing, 1997.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.4 INFORMATION SYSTEMS APPLICATIONS

Additional Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.2 DATABASE MANAGEMENT
      H.2.3 Languages
          Subjects: Query languages

General Terms:
Algorithms, Experimentation, Languages