ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Online multicast routing with bandwidth guarantees: a new approach using multicast network flow
Full text PdfPdf (884 KB)
Source Joint International Conference on Measurement and Modeling of Computer Systems archive
Proceedings of the 2000 ACM SIGMETRICS international conference on Measurement and modeling of computer systems table of contents
Santa Clara, California, United States
Pages: 296 - 306  
Year of Publication: 2000
ISBN:1-58113-194-1
Also published in ...
Authors
Murali S. Kodialam  Bell Laboratories, Lucent Technologies, Holmdel, NJ
T. V. Lakshman  Bell Laboratories, Lucent Technologies, Holmdel, NJ
Sudipta Sengupta  Laboratory for Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
Sponsor
SIGMETRICS: ACM Special Interest Group on Measurement and Evaluation
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4,   Downloads (12 Months): 16,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/339331.339425
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper presents a new algorithm for on-line routing of bandwidth-guaranteed multicasts where routing requests arrive one-by-one without there being any a priori knowledge of future requests. A multicast routing request consists of a source s, a set of receivers R, and a bandwidth requirement b. This multicast routing problem arises in many contexts. Two applications of interest are routing of point-to-multipoint label-switched paths in Multi-Protocol Label Switched (MPLS) networks, and the provision of bandwidth guaranteed Virtual Private Network (VPN) services under the “hose” service model [17]. Offline multicast routing algorithms cannot be used since they require a priori knowledge of all multicast requests that are to be routed. Instead, on-line algorithms that handle requests arriving one-by-one and that satisfy as many potential future demands as possible are needed. The newly developed algorithm is an on-line algorithm and is based on the idea that a newly routed multicast must follow a route that does not “interfere too much” with network paths that may be critical to satisfy future demands. We develop a multicast tree selection heuristic that is based on the idea of deferred loading of certain “critical” links. These critical links are identified by the algorithm as links that, if heavily loaded, would make it impossible to satisfy future demands between certain ingress-egress pairs. The presented algorithm uses link-state information and some auxilliary capacity information for multicast tree selection and is amenable to distributed implementation. Unlike previous algorithms, the proposed algorithm exploits any available knowledge of the network ingress-egress points of potential future demands even though the demands themselves are unknown and performs very well.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
 
3
M. J. Alexander and G. Robins. New Performance-Driven FPGA Routing Algorithms. 1EEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, Vo}. 15, No. 12, pp. 1505-1517, December 1996.
 
4
D. O. Awduche, L. Berger, D. Can, T. Li, G. Swallow, V. Srinivas~,. Extensions to RSVP for LSP Tunnels, Internet Dra}t draft- iet}- topis- rsvp-lsp-tunnet- O0.txt, November 1998.
 
5
D. O. Awduche, J. MMcom, J. Agogbua, IV{. O13ell, J. McManus. Requirements for Traffic Engineering over MPLS, Internet Draft draft-ietf-mpls-traffic-eng-OO.txt, October 1998.
 
6
 
7
 
8
R. Callon, N. Feldman, A. Fredette, G. Swallow, A. Viswanathan. A Framework for Multiprotocol Label Switching, Internet Draft draft-ietf-mpls-framework-O3.txt, June 1999.
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
R. Guerin, D. Williams, A. Przygiend;t, S. Kamat, A. Orda. QoS Routing Mechanisms and OSPF Extensions. Internet Draft draft-guerin-qos-routing-ospf-O$.txt, December 1998.
 
13
R. Guerin, D. Williams, A. Orda. QoS Routing Mechanisms and OSPF Extensions. Proceedings of Globecom 1997.
 
14
M. Karpinsky and A. Zelikovsky. New approximation algorithms for the Steiner tree problem. Technical Report, Electronic Colloquium on Computational Complexity (ECCC), TR95-030, 1995.
 
15
M. Kodialam, T. V. Lakshman. On-line Routing of Guaranteed Bandwidth Tunnels. Seventh IFIP Workshop on Performance Modelling and Evaluation of A TM/IP Networks, June 1999.
 
16
M. KodiMam, T. V. Lakshman. Minimum Interference Routing with Applications to MPLS Traffic Engineering. To appear Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM ~-000.
17
 
18
D. Ooms, W. Livens, B. Sales, M. Ramalho, A. Acharya, F. Griffoul, F. Ansari. Framework for IP Multicast in MPLS. MPLS Working Group lnternet Draft, June 1999.
 
19
 
20
E. Rosen, A. Viswa~athan, and R. Callon. Multiprotocol Label Switching Architecture. work ia progress, Internet Draft draft-ietf-rapls-arch-O2.txt, July 1998.
 
21
B. M. Waxman. Performance Evaluation of Multipoint Routing Algorithms. Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, pp, 980-986, 1993.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Murali S. Kodialam: colleagues
T. V. Lakshman: colleagues
Sudipta Sengupta: colleagues