ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A methodology for modeling the effects of systematic within-die interconnect and device variation on circuit performance
Full text PdfPdf (1.01 MB)
Source Annual ACM IEEE Design Automation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 37th Annual Design Automation Conference table of contents
Los Angeles, California, United States
Pages: 172 - 175  
Year of Publication: 2000
ISBN:1-58113-187-9
Authors
Vikas Mehrotra  Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
Shiou Lin Sam  Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
Duane Boning  Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
Anantha Chandrakasan  Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
Rakesh Vallishayee  PDF Solutions, San Jose, CA
Sani Nassif  IBM, Austin, TX
Sponsors
SIGDA: ACM Special Interest Group on Design Automation
EDAC : Electronic Design Automation Consortium
IEEE-CAS : Circuits & Systems
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 15,   Downloads (12 Months): 46,   Citation Count: 23
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/337292.337370
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We present a methodology to study the impact of spatial pattern dependent variation on circuit performance and implement the technique in a CAD framework. We investigate the effects of interconnect CMP and poly CD device variation on interconnect delay and clock skew in both aluminum and copper interconnect technology. Our results indicate that interconnect CMP variation strongly affects interconnect delay, while poly CD variation has a large impact on clock skew in a 1 GHz design. Given this circuit impact, CAD tools in the future must account for such systematic within-die variations.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
D. Boning et al., Manuf. Yield, Reliability, and Failure Analysis session, SPIE Symp. Microelectronic Manuf, Austin, Oct. 1996.
 
2
C. Chow, IEEE Trans. on Semi. Manuf., May 1989.
 
3
E Hofstee et al., ISSCC, Feb. 2000.
 
4
L. Liebmann et al., Proc. SPIE, Vol. 3051, 1997, p.124.
 
5
V. Mehrotra et al., IEDM, San Francisco, Dec. 1998, p.767.
 
6
 
7
S. Nassif, IEDM, San Francisco, Dec. 1998, p.283.
 
8
D. Ouma et al., Manuf Yield, Reliability, and Failure Analysis session, SPIE Symp. Microelectronic Manuf, Austin, Oct. 1997.
 
9
T. Park et al., VMIC, Santa Clara, June 1998.
 
10
T. Sakurai, IEEE Trans. Elecnvn Devices,Vol. 40, No. 1,1993.
 
11
B. Stine et al., CMP-MIC, Santa Clara, Feb. 1997, p.266.
 
12
B. Stine et al.,IEDM, Wash. DC, Dec. 1997, p.133.
 
13
T. Tugbawa et al., ECS, Honolulu, Oct. 1999.

CITED BY  23

Collaborative Colleagues:
Vikas Mehrotra: colleagues
Shiou Lin Sam: colleagues
Duane Boning: colleagues
Anantha Chandrakasan: colleagues
Rakesh Vallishayee: colleagues
Sani Nassif: colleagues