| Formal verification of superscale microprocessors with multicycle functional units, exception, and branch prediction |
| Full text |
Pdf
(70 KB)
|
| Source
|
Annual ACM IEEE Design Automation Conference
archive
Proceedings of the 37th Annual Design Automation Conference
table of contents
Los Angeles, California, United States
Pages: 112 - 117
Year of Publication: 2000
ISBN:1-58113-187-9
|
|
Authors
|
|
Miroslav N. Velev
|
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
|
|
Randal E. Bryant
|
School of Computer Science, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 3, Downloads (12 Months): 16, Citation Count: 19
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
We extend the Burch and Dill flushing technique [6] for formal verification of microprocessors to be applicable to designs where the functional units and memories have multicycle and possibly arbitrary latency. We also show ways to incorporate exceptions and branch prediction by exploiting the properties of the logic of Positive Equality with Uninterpreted Functions [4][5]. We study the modeling of the above features in different versions of dual-issue superscalar processors.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
W. Ackermann, Solvable Cases of the Decision Problem, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1954.
|
| |
2
|
ARM Technical Reference Manuals & Data Sheets, http: //www. arm. com.
|
 |
3
|
|
| |
4
|
|
| |
5
|
R.E. Bryant, S. German, and M.N. Velev, "Processor Verification Using Efficient Reductions of the Logic of Uninterpreted Functions to Propositional Logic,''2 Technical Report CMU-CS-99-115, Carnegie Mellon University, 1999.
|
| |
6
|
|
 |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
|
| |
9
|
CUDD-2.3.0, http ://vlsi. colorado, edu/~fabio.
|
| |
10
|
|
| |
11
|
|
| |
12
|
|
| |
13
|
R. Hosabettu, M. Srivas, and G. Gopalakrishnan, "Proof of Correctness of a Processor with Reorder Buffer Using the Completion Functions Approach," Computer-Aided Verification (CAV'99), N. Halbwachs and D. Peled, eds., LNCS 1633, Springer-Verlag, June 1999, pp. 45-59.
|
| |
14
|
MoCORE: microRISC Engine Programmer's Manual, http://www, motorola, com/SPS/MCORE.
|
| |
15
|
|
| |
16
|
|
| |
17
|
|
| |
18
|
Stanford Validity Checker, http: //sprout. stanford, edu.
|
| |
19
|
|
| |
20
|
|
| |
21
|
|
| |
22
|
M.N. Velev, and R.E. Bryant, "Formal Verification of Superscalar Microprocessors with Multicycle Functional Units, Exceptions, and Branch Prediction,''2 Technical Report CMU-CS-00-116, Carnegie Mellon University, 2000.
|
|