ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Formal verification of superscale microprocessors with multicycle functional units, exception, and branch prediction
Full text PdfPdf (70 KB)
Source Annual ACM IEEE Design Automation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 37th Annual Design Automation Conference table of contents
Los Angeles, California, United States
Pages: 112 - 117  
Year of Publication: 2000
ISBN:1-58113-187-9
Authors
Miroslav N. Velev  Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
Randal E. Bryant  School of Computer Science, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
Sponsors
SIGDA: ACM Special Interest Group on Design Automation
EDAC : Electronic Design Automation Consortium
IEEE-CAS : Circuits & Systems
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 3,   Downloads (12 Months): 16,   Citation Count: 19
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/337292.337331
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We extend the Burch and Dill flushing technique [6] for formal verification of microprocessors to be applicable to designs where the functional units and memories have multicycle and possibly arbitrary latency. We also show ways to incorporate exceptions and branch prediction by exploiting the properties of the logic of Positive Equality with Uninterpreted Functions [4][5]. We study the modeling of the above features in different versions of dual-issue superscalar processors.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
W. Ackermann, Solvable Cases of the Decision Problem, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1954.
 
2
ARM Technical Reference Manuals & Data Sheets, http: //www. arm. com.
3
 
4
 
5
R.E. Bryant, S. German, and M.N. Velev, "Processor Verification Using Efficient Reductions of the Logic of Uninterpreted Functions to Propositional Logic,''2 Technical Report CMU-CS-99-115, Carnegie Mellon University, 1999.
 
6
7
 
8
 
9
CUDD-2.3.0, http ://vlsi. colorado, edu/~fabio.
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
R. Hosabettu, M. Srivas, and G. Gopalakrishnan, "Proof of Correctness of a Processor with Reorder Buffer Using the Completion Functions Approach," Computer-Aided Verification (CAV'99), N. Halbwachs and D. Peled, eds., LNCS 1633, Springer-Verlag, June 1999, pp. 45-59.
 
14
MoCORE: microRISC Engine Programmer's Manual, http://www, motorola, com/SPS/MCORE.
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
Stanford Validity Checker, http: //sprout. stanford, edu.
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
M.N. Velev, and R.E. Bryant, "Formal Verification of Superscalar Microprocessors with Multicycle Functional Units, Exceptions, and Branch Prediction,''2 Technical Report CMU-CS-00-116, Carnegie Mellon University, 2000.

CITED BY  19

Collaborative Colleagues:
Miroslav N. Velev: colleagues
Randal E. Bryant: colleagues