Component-based software engineering and the issue of trust

Subscribe (Full Service)


	Search: The ACM Digital Library The Guide

	Feedback

Component-based software engineering and the issue of trust

Full text

Pdf (63 KB)

Source

International Conference on Software Engineering archive
Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on Software engineering table of contents

Limerick, Ireland

Pages: 661 - 664

Year of Publication: 2000

ISBN:1-58113-206-9

Authors

Bill Councill	Texas Quintessence Corporation, 3909 Morningside Drive, Plano, TX
Janet S. Flynt	Electronics department, Underwriters Laboratories Inc.
Alok Mehta	American Financial Systems, Inc., (AFS), Weston, MA
John R. Speed	Consulting engineer, design and program management for public infrastructure
Mary Shaw	School of Computer Science, Carnegie, Mellon University

Chairmen

George T. Heineman

Computer Science Department, WPI, 100 Institute Road, Worcester, MA

Sponsors

IEEE-CS : Computer Society
SIGSOFT: ACM Special Interest Group on Software Engineering
Irish Comp Soc : Irish Computer Society

Publisher

ACM New York, NY, USA

Bibliometrics

Downloads (6 Weeks): 14, Downloads (12 Months): 113, Citation Count: 3

Additional Information:

abstract references cited by index terms collaborative colleagues

Tools and Actions:	Review this Article Save this Article to a Binder Display Formats: BibTeX EndNote ACM Ref

DOI Bookmark:	Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/337180.337501 What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Software component consumers are entitled to trusted components. This panel addresses the criteria for trusted components and presents generally accepted definitions for all terms used to describe both software components and the methods and processes required to verify trusted software components.

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

	1	UL 1998, 2nd ed., UL Standard for Safety for Software in Programmable Components, Underwriters Laboratories Inc., Northbrook, IL., May 1998.
	2	Bill Councill, Third-Party Testing and Stirrings of the New Software Engineering, IEEE Software, v.16 n.6, p.76-79, November 1999 [doi>10.1109/52.805478]
	3	William T. Councill, Third-Party Testing and the Quality of Software Components, IEEE Software, v.16 n.4, p.55-57, July 1999 [doi>10.1109/52.776949]
	4	US Small Business Administration's Web Site. <http://www.sba.gov/ADVO/stats/profiles/98us.html >.
	5	Texas Board of Professional Engineers Web Site. Available at http://www.main.org/peboard/softw.htm.
	6	George T. Heineman , William T. Councill, Component-based software engineering: putting the pieces together, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, 2001
	7	Mary Shaw, Truth vs Knowledge: The Difference Between What a Component Does and What We Know It Does, Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Software Specification and Design, p.181, March 22-23, 1996
	8	Douglas W. Bennett, The Promise of Reuse, Object Magazine, 4(8), pp. 5-68, January 1995.
	9	J. Morgenstern, "The Fifty-Nine Story Crisis". The New Yorker, 29, May 1995, pp 45-53.
	10	David Garlan , Robert Allen , John Ockerbloom, Architectural Mismatch: Why Reuse Is So Hard, IEEE Software, v.12 n.6, p.17-26, November 1995 [doi>10.1109/52.469757]

CITED BY 3

	Nasib S. Gill, Reusability issues in component-based development, ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, v.28 n.4, July 2003
	N. S. Gill , P. S. Grover, Component-based measurement: few useful guidelines, ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, v.28 n.6, November 2003
	Odd Petter N. Slyngstad , Anita Gupta , Reidar Conradi , Parastoo Mohagheghi , Harald Rønneberg , Einar Landre, An empirical study of developers views on software reuse in statoil ASA, Proceedings of the 2006 ACM/IEEE international symposium on International symposium on empirical software engineering, September 21-22, 2006, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil