| An inheritance-based technique for building simulation proofs incrementally |
| Full text |
Pdf
(337 KB)
|
| Source
|
International Conference on Software Engineering
archive
Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on Software engineering
table of contents
Limerick, Ireland
Pages: 478 - 487
Year of Publication: 2000
ISBN:1-58113-206-9
|
|
Authors
|
|
Idit Keidar
|
MIT Lab for Computer Science, 545 Technology Sq., Room 367, Cambridge, MA
|
|
Roger Khazan
|
MIT Lab for Computer Science, 545 Technology Sq., Room 367, Cambridge, MA
|
|
Nancy Lynch
|
MIT Lab for Computer Science, 545 Technology Sq., Room 367, Cambridge, MA
|
|
Alex Shvartsman
|
University of Connecticut, Computer Science and Engineering Dept., Storrs, CT
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6, Downloads (12 Months): 18, Citation Count: 2
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
This paper presents a technique for incrementally constructing safety specifications, abstract algorithm descriptions, and simulation proofs showing that algorithms meet their specifications.The technique for building specifications (and algorithms) allows a child specification (or algorithm) to inherit from its parent by two forms of incremental modification: (a) interface extension, where new forms of interaction are added to the parent's interface, and (b) specialization (subtyping), where new data, restrictions, and effects are added to the parent's behavior description. The combination of interface extension and specialization constitutes a powerful and expressive incremental modification mechanism for describing changes that do not override the behavior of the parent, although it may introduce new behavior.Consider the case when incremental modification is applied to both a parent specification S and a parent algorithm A. A proof that the child algorithm A′ implements the child specification S′ can be built incrementally upon simulation proof that algorithm A implements specification S. The new work required involves reasoning about the modifications, but does not require repetition of the reasoning in the original simulation proof.The paper presents the technique mathematically, in terms of automata. The technique has already been used to model and validate a full-fledged group communication system (see [26]); the methodology and results of that experiment are summarized in this paper.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
|
| |
2
|
|
| |
3
|
ACM. Commun. ACM 39(4), special issue on Group Communications Systems, April 1996.
|
| |
4
|
E. Anceaume, B. Charron-Bost, P. Minet, and S. Toueg. On the formal speci cation of group membership services. Comp. Sci. TR 95-1534, Cornell Univ., Aug. 1995.
|
| |
5
|
|
| |
6
|
M. Bickford and J. Hickey. An object-oriented approach to verifying group communication systems. http://www.cs.cornell.edu/jyh/papers/cav99 ooioa/.
|
| |
7
|
K. Birman, R. Friedman, M. Hayden, and I. Rhee. Middleware support for distributed multimedia and collaborative computing. Multimedia Computing and Networking (MMCN98), 1998.
|
| |
8
|
|
| |
9
|
G. V. Chockler. An Adaptive Totally Ordered Multicast Protocol that Tolerates Partitions. Master's thesis, Institute of Computer Science, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel, 1997.
|
| |
10
|
|
 |
11
|
Roberto De Prisco , Alan Fekete , Nancy Lynch , Alex Shvartsman, A dynamic view-oriented group communication service, Proceedings of the seventeenth annual ACM symposium on Principles of distributed computing, p.227-236, June 28-July 02, 1998, Puerto Vallarta, Mexico
[doi> 10.1145/277697.277739]
|
| |
12
|
|
| |
13
|
|
| |
14
|
Alan Fekete , David Gupta , Victor Luchangco , Nancy Lynch , Alex Shvartsman, Eventually-serializable data services, Theoretical Computer Science, v.220 n.1, p.113-156, June 6, 1999
[doi> 10.1016/S0304-3975(98)00239-4]
|
 |
15
|
Alan Fekete , Nancy Lynch , Alex Shvartsman, Specifying and using a partitionable group communication service, Proceedings of the sixteenth annual ACM symposium on Principles of distributed computing, p.53-62, August 21-24, 1997, Santa Barbara, California, United States
[doi> 10.1145/259380.259422]
|
| |
16
|
|
| |
17
|
|
| |
18
|
S. J. Garland, N. A. Lynch, and M. Vaziri. IOA: A Language for Specifying, Programming and Validating Distributed Systems. MIT LCS, Dec. 1997. http://sds.lcs.mit.edu/~garland/ioaLanguage.html.
|
| |
19
|
|
| |
20
|
|
| |
21
|
C. Heitmeyer and N. Lynch. The generalized railroad crossing: A case study in formal verification of realtime systems. Real Time Systems Symposium, Dec. 1994. Full version: MR-7619, Naval Research Laboratory.
|
| |
22
|
|
| |
23
|
|
| |
24
|
|
 |
25
|
|
| |
26
|
|
| |
27
|
|
| |
28
|
|
| |
29
|
B. Lampson. Generalizing Abstraction Functions. MIT, Laboratory for Computer Science, Principles of Computer Systems, Handout 8, 1997. ftp://theory.lcs.mit .edu/pub/classes/6.826/www/6.826-top.html.
|
| |
30
|
|
| |
31
|
|
| |
32
|
N. Lynch and M. Tuttle. An introduction to Input/Output Automata. CWI Quart., 2(3):219{246, '89.
|
 |
33
|
|
| |
34
|
I. Shnaiderman. Implementation of Reliable Datagram Service in the LAN environment. Lab project, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, January 1999. http://www.cs.huji.ac.il/~transis/publications.html.
|
| |
35
|
|
 |
36
|
Raymie Stata , John V. Guttag, Modular reasoning in the presence of subclassing, Proceedings of the tenth annual conference on Object-oriented programming systems, languages, and applications, p.200-214, October 15-19, 1995, Austin, Texas, United States
|
| |
37
|
R. Vitenberg, I. Keidar, G. V. Chockler, and D. Dolev. Group Communication Specifications: A Comprehensive Study. TR CS99-31, Institute of Comp. Science, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel, Sept. 1999.
|
| |
38
|
D. Yates, N. Lynch, V. Luchangco, and M. Seltzer. I/O automaton model of operating system primitives. Master's thesis, Harvard University and MIT, May 1999.
|
|