Investigating and improving a COTS-based software development

ABSTRACT

The work described in this paper is an investigation of COTS-based software development within a particular NASA environment, with an emphasis on the processes used. Fifteen projects using a COTS-based approach were studied and their actual process was documented. This process is evaluated to identify essential differences in comparison to traditional software development. The main differences, and the activities for which projects require more guidance, are requirements definition and COTS selection, high level design, integration and testing. Starting from these empirical observations, a new process and guidelines for COTS-based development are developed and briefly presented. The new process is currently under experimentation.

REFERENCES

• 1: Basili V.R., Caldiera C., Rombach H.D., Experience Factory, Encyclopedia of Software Engineering, Marciniak J.J. editor, Volume 1, John Wiley, 1994, pp 469-476.
• 2: Basili, V.R., D. M. Weiss, A Methodology for Collecting Valid Software Engineering Data, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. SE-10, no.6, November 1984, pp. 728-738.
• 3: Miles, M. B., A. M. Huberman, Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 2 nd Edition, Sage Publications, 1994.
• 4: Carney, D. Assembling Large Systems from COTS Components: Opportunities, Cautions, and Complexities. SEI Monographs on Use of Commercial Software in Government Systems, Software Engineering Institute, Pittsburgh, USA, June 1997.
• 5: Glaser, B.G., A.L. Strauss. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine Publishing Company, 1967.
• 6: Jyrki Kontio, A case study in applying a systematic method for COTS selection, Proceedings of the 18th international conference on Software engineering, p.201-209, March 25-29, 1996, Berlin, Germany
• 7: Morisio M., Tsouki~s A., IusWare: A methodology for the evaluation and selection of software products, IEE Proceedings Software Engineering, June 1997, pp. 162-174.
• 8: NASA/SEL, SEL COTS Study, Phase 1, Initial Characterization Study report, SEL-98-001, August 1998.
• 9: NASA/SEL, SEL COTS Study, Phase 2, New proposed COTS process, SEL-99-002, November 1999.
• 10: Parra, A., C. Seaman, V. Basili, S. Kraft, S. Condon, S. Burke, and D. Yakimovich, The Package-Based Development Process in the Flight Dynamics Division. in Proc. of the Twenty-second Software Engineering Workshop, NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center, December 1997, pp. 21-56.
• 11: NASA/SEL, SEL Recommended Approach to Software Development, Revision 3, SEL-81-305, June 1992.
• 12: Software Engineering Institute, COTS-Based Initiative Description, available at <http:// www.sei.cmu.edu/cbs/cbs_description.html>.
• 13: Software Engineering Institute, COTS-Based Initiative Overview, available at <http:// www.sei.cmu.edu/cbs/cbs_description.html>.
• 14: Daniil Yakimovich , James M. Bieman , Victor R. Basili, Software architecture classification for estimating the cost of COTS integration, Proceedings of the 21st international conference on Software engineering, p.296-302, May 16-22, 1999, Los Angeles, California, United States [doi>10.1145/302405.302643]
• 15: Yakimovich D., Travassos G.H., Basili V.R., A classification of software components incompatibilities for COTS integration, Proc. of the 24th Software Engineering Workshop, NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center, December 1999.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  K. Computing Milieux
  K.6 MANAGEMENT OF COMPUTING AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS
      K.6.3 Software Management
          Subjects: Software development

Additional Classification:
  D. Software
  D.2 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING

General Terms:
Design, Management, Performance, Theory

Keywords:
COTS, commercial off-the-shelf, component-based, empirical study, software development process