ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Setting 2 variables at a time yields a new lower bound for random 3-SAT (extended abstract)
Full text PdfPdf (1.02 MB)
Source Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing archive
Proceedings of the thirty-second annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing table of contents
Portland, Oregon, United States
Pages: 28 - 37  
Year of Publication: 2000
ISBN:1-58113-184-4
Author
Dimitris Achlioptas  Microsoft Research, One Microsoft Way, Redmond, WA
Sponsor
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 3,   Downloads (12 Months): 30,   Citation Count: 20
Additional Information:

references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/335305.335309
What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
D. Achlioptas, L. M. Kirousis, E. Kranakis, and D. Krizanc. Rigorous results for random (2 +p)-SAT. In Proceedings of RALCOM 97 (Santorini, Greece), pages 1-13, 1997. Submitted to Theoret. Comput. Sci.
 
2
P. Beame and T. Pitassi. Propositional proof complexity: past, present, and future. Bull. Eur. Assoc. Theor. Comput. Sci. EATCS, (65):66-89, 1998.
 
3
B. Bollobfis, C. Borgs, J. Chayes, J. H. Kim, and D. B. Wilson. The scaling window of the 2-SAT transition. Manuscript, 1999.
 
4
 
5
 
6
V. Chv~tal and B. Reed. Mick gets some (the odds are on his side). In 33th Annual Symposium on Foundations o/Computer Science (Pittsburgh, PA, 199~), pages 620-627. iEEE Comput. Soc. Press, Los Alamitos, CA, 1992.
7
8
 
9
S. A. Cook and D. G. Mitchell. Finding hard instances of the satisfiability problem: a survey. In Satisfiability problem: theory and applications (Piscataway, N J, 1996), pages 1-17. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1997.
10
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
A. El Maftouhi and W. Fernandez de la Vega. On random 3-SAT. Combin. Probab. Comput., 4(3):189-195, 1995.
 
15
W. Fernandez de la Vega. On random 2-SAT. 1992. Manuscript.
 
16
J. Franco. Probabilistic analysis of the pure literal heuristic for the satisfiability problem. Ann. Oper. Res., 1:273-289, 1984.
 
17
J. Franco and M. Paul1. Probabilistic analysis of the Davis-Putnam procedure for solving the satisftability problem. Discrete Appl. Math., 5(1):77-87, 1983.
 
18
E. Friedgut. Necessary and sufficient conditions for sharp thresholds of graph properties, and the k-SAT problem. J. Amer. Math. Soc., 12:1017-1054, 1999.
 
19
 
20
 
21
A. Goldberg. On the complexity of the satisfiability problem. In jth Workshop on Automated Deduction (Austin, TX, 1979), pages 1-6, 1979.
 
22
A. Haken. The intractability of resolution. Theoret. Comput. Sci., 39(2-3):297-308, 1985.
 
23
S. Janson, Y. C. Stamatiou, and M. Vamwakari. Bounding the unsatisfiability threshold of random 3-SAT. 1999. Submitted.
 
24
 
25
R. Karp and M. Sipser. Maximum matchings in sparse random graphs. In 2~nd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pages 364-375. IEEE Cornput. Soc. Press, Los Alamitos, CA, 1981.
 
26
 
27
T. G. Kurtz. Solutions of ordinary differential equations as limits of pure jump Markov processes. J. Appl. Probability, 7:49-58, 1970.
 
28
T. G. Kurtz. Approximation of population processes. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM), Philadelphia, Pa., 1981.
 
29
A. W. Marshall and I. Olkin. Inequalities: theory of majorization and its applications. Academic Press Inc. {Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Publishers}, New York, 1979.
 
30
R. Monasson and R. Zecchina. Entropy of the K- satisfiability problem. Phys. Rev. Left., 76(21):3881- 3885, 1996.
 
31
R. Monasson and R. Zecchina. Statistical mechanics of the random K-satisfiability model. Phys. Rev. E (3), 56(2):1357-1370, 1997.
 
32
R. Monasson and R. Zecchina. Tricritical points in random combinatorics: the (2 + p)-SAT case. J. Phys. A, 1998. submitted.
 
33
R. Monasson, R. Zecchina, S. Kirkpatrick, B. Selman, and L. Troyansky. Phase transition and search cost in the (2 + p)-SAT problem. In Jth Workshop on Physics and Computation, (Boston, MA, 1996).
 
34
R. Monasson, R. Zecchina, S. Kirkpatrick, B. Selman, and L. Troyansky. Determining computational complexity from characteristic phase transitions. Nature, 400:133-137, 1999.
 
35
 
36
 
37
 
38
N. C. Wormald. Differential equations for random processes and random graphs. Ann. Appl. Probab., 5(4):1217-1235, 1995.

CITED BY  20

Collaborative Colleagues:
Dimitris Achlioptas: colleagues