ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A low-complexity issue logic
Full text PdfPdf (996 KB)
Source International Conference on Supercomputing archive
Proceedings of the 14th international conference on Supercomputing table of contents
Santa Fe, New Mexico, United States
Pages: 327 - 335  
Year of Publication: 2000
ISBN:1-58113-270-0
Authors
Ramon Canal  Departament d'Arquitectura de Computadors, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Jordi Girona, 1-3 Mòdul D6, 08034 Barcelona, Spain
Antonio González  Departament d'Arquitectura de Computadors, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Jordi Girona, 1-3 Mòdul D6, 08034 Barcelona, Spain
Sponsor
SIGARCH: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Architecture
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 34,   Citation Count: 27
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/335231.335263
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

One of the main concerns in today's processor design is the issue logic. Instruction-level parallelism is usually favored by an out-of-order issue mechanism where instructions can issue independently of the program order. The out-of-order scheme yields the best performance but at the same time introduces important hardware costs such as an associative look-up, which might be prohibitive for wide issue processors with large instruction windows. This associative search may slow-down the clock-rate and it has an important impact on power consumption. In this work, two new issue schemes that reduce the hardware complexity of the issue logic with minimal impact on the average number of instructions executed per cycle are presented.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
M.T. Bohr, "Interconnect Scaling - The Real Limiter to High Performance VLSI", in Proc. of the 1995 IEEE Int. Electron Devices Meeting, pp. 241-244, 1995.
 
2
D. Burger, T.M. Austin, S. Bennett, "Evaluating Future Microprocessors: The SimpleScalar Tool Set", Technical Report CS-TR-96-1308, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1996.
 
3
R. Canal, J.M. Parcerisa, A. Gonzalez, "Dynamic Cluster Assignment Mechanisms", in Proc. of the Int. Symp. on High-Performance Computer Architecture, pp. 133-142, 2000.
4
 
5
6
 
7
 
8
G.A. Kemp, M. Franklin, "PEWs: A Decentralized Dynamic Scheduler for ILP Processing", in Proc. of the Int. Conf. on Parallel Processing, v.1, pp 239-246, 1996.
9
 
10
 
11
12
 
13
 
14
Semiconductor Industry Association, "The National Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors", 1997.
15
 
16
R.M. Tomasulo, "An efficient algorithm for exploiting multiple arithmetic units", IBM Journal of Research and Development vol 11, pp. 25-33, 1967.
17
 
18
D.W. Wall, "Limits of Instruction-Level Parallelism", Techincal Report WRL 93/6, Digital Western Research Lab, 1993.
 
19
S. Weiss, J.E. Smith, "Instruction Issue Logic in Pipelined Supercomputers", in the IEEE transactions on computers, vol. Co33, no.l l, pp 1013-1022, November 1984.
 
20

CITED BY  27

Collaborative Colleagues:
Ramon Canal: colleagues
Antonio González: colleagues