| Integration of IT into the school curricula: perceptions of kindergarden to highschool (K-12) teachers |
| Full text |
Pdf
(354 KB)
|
| Source
|
Special Interest Group on Computer Personnel Research Annual Conference
archive
Proceedings of the 2000 ACM SIGCPR conference on Computer personnel research
table of contents
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Pages: 33 - 38
Year of Publication: 2000
ISBN:1-58113-212-X
|
|
Authors
|
|
Conrad Shayo
|
California State University, San Bernardino, 5500 University Parkway, San Bernardino, CA
|
|
Lorne Olfman
|
Information Sciences Department, Claremont Graduate University, 130 East Ninth Street, Claremont, CA
|
|
Ruth Guthrie
|
College of Business Administration, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, 3801 West Temple Ave Pomona, CA
|
|
| Sponsor |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6, Downloads (12 Months): 21, Citation Count: 1
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
Computer use in schools is still low compared to use in other sectors of the economy. Recent surveys have found that even in schools on the leading edge in computer use, slightly less than half (42%) of the teachers use computers for instruction. This pilot study investigates the perceptions of K-12 teachers with respect to the integration of computers into the school curricula. The study is important given the recent efforts by federal, state and local governments to stimulate the use of computers in schools. A total of 1280 teachers from a South Western USA school district participated in the survey. Preliminary analyses show that causes of non-integration of computers in the school curricula are not solely determined by individual or software characteristics but the result of interaction between individual, software, and school environment characteristics. The findings confirm interactionist theories of resistance of change.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
1994 Goal 2000: Educate America Act {1994}. http ://www. uhuh. com/laws/~ o al s2 O00.htm.
|
| |
2
|
Quality Education Data {1997}. h_tLtp://www.q_eddam.com/.
|
| |
3
|
|
| |
4
|
Davis, F. (1989). "Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 13 (4)pp. 319-340.
|
| |
5
|
Gorsuch, R.L. (1983). b~ctor Analysis. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale: New Jersey.
|
| |
6
|
|
 |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
Moore, G.C.& Benbasat, I. (1991). "Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting Information Technology Innovation." Information Systems Research, Vol. 2(3), pp. 192 ~ 222.
|
| |
9
|
|
| |
10
|
Olfman L.& Bostrom, R.P.(1991). "End User software training: An experimental comparison of methods to enhance motivation." Journal of information Systems, Vol. 1(4), pp. 249 - 266.
|
|