Protein structure determination using protein threading and sparse NMR data (extended abstract)

ABSTRACT

It is well known that the NMR method for protein structure determination applies to small proteins and that its effectiveness decreases very rapidly as the molecular weight increases beyond about 30 kD. We have recently developed a method for protein structure determination that can fully utilize partial NMR data as calculation constraints. The core of the method is a threading algorithm that guarantees to find a globally optimal alignment between a query sequence and a template structure, under distance constraints specified by NMR/NOE data. Our preliminary tests have demonstrated that a small number of NMR/NOE distance restraints can significantly improve threading performance in both fold recognition and threading-alignment accuracy, and can possibly extend threading's scope of applicability from structural homologs to structural analogs. An accurate backbone structure generated by NMR-constrained threading can then provide a significant amount of structural information, equivalent to that provided by the NMR method with many NMR/NOE restraints; and hence can greatly reduce the amount of NMR data typically required for accurate structure determination. Our prelimenary study suggest that a small number of NOE restraints may suffice to determine adequately the all-atom structure when those restraints are incorporated in a procedure combining threading, modeling of loops and sidechains, and molecular dynamics simulation. Potentially, this new technique can expand NMR's capability to larger proteins.

REFERENCES

• 1: W. Braun and N. GS. Calculation of protein conformations by proton-proton distance constraints: a new efficient algorithm. J. Mol. Bzol., 186:611 - 626, 1985.
• 2: R. M. Levy, D. A. Bassolino, D. B. Kitechen, and A. Pardi. Solution structures of proteins from NMR data and modeling: alternative folds for neutrophil peptide 5. Biochemistry, 28:9361 - 9372, 1989.
• 3: A. T. Briinger. X-PLOR, Vevswn 3.1, A System for X-ray Crystallography arid NMR. The Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry, Yale University, New Haven, 1992.
• 4: Y. Karimi-Nejad, G. L. Warren, D. Schipper, A. T. Briinger, and R. Boelens. NMR structure calculation methods for large proteins- application of torson angle dynamics and distance geometry/simulated annealing to the 269-residue protein serine protease PB92. MoI. Phys., 95:1099-1112, 1998.
• 5: F. C. Bernstein, T. F. Koetzle, G. J. B. Williams, E. F. Meyer, M. D. Brice, J. R. Rodgers, O. Kennard, T. Shimanouchi, and M. Tasumi. The protein data bank: a computer based archival file for macromolecular structures. J. MoI. Bwl., 112:535- 542, 1977.
• 6: W. F. Humphrey, A. Dalke, and K. Schulten. VMD - visual molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Graphics, 14:33-38, 1996.
• 7: Ying Xu , Dong Xu , Edward C. Uberbacher, A new method for modeling and solving the protein fold recognition problem (extended abstract), Proceedings of the second annual international conference on Computational molecular biology, p.285-292, March 22-25, 1998, New York, New York, United States [doi>10.1145/279069.279134]
• 8: Y. Xu, D. Xu, and E. C. Uberbacher. An efficient computational method for globally optimal threading. J. Comp Bzol., 5(3):597-614, 1998.
• 9: Y. Xu, D. Xu, O. H. Crawford, J. R. Einstein, F. Latimer, E. C. Uberbacher, M. A. Unseren, and G. Zhang. Protein threading by PROSPECT: A prediction experiment in CASP3. Protein Eng., 12:899-907, 1999.
• 10: Y. Xu and D. Xu. Protein threading using PROSPECT: Design and evaluation. 1999. Submitted.
• 11: Franco P. Preparata , Michael I. Shamos, Computational geometry: an introduction, Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., New York, NY, 1985
• 12: L. Holm and C. Sander. Mapping the protein universe. Science, 273:595-602, 1996.
• 13: A. Salt and T. L. Blundell. Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J. Mol. Biol., 234:779-815, 1993.
• 14: MacKerrell, Jr., et al.. All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. J. Phys. Chem., B102:3586-3616, 1998.
• 15: A. T. Brfinger, P. D. Adams, G. M. Clore, W. L. Delano, P. Gros, R. W. Grosse-Kunstleve, J. S. Jiang, J. Kuszewski, N. Nilges, N. S. Pannu, R. J. Read, L. Rice, T. Simonson, and G. L. Warren. Crystallography and NMR system (CNS): a new software system for macromolecular structure determination. Acta Cryst., D54:905-921, 1998.
• 16: K. M. Pappu and E. H. Serpersu. Proton NMR studies of a large protein, pH, substrate titrations, and NOESY experiments with perdeuterated yeast phosphoglycerate kinase containing ~H histidine residues. J. Magn. Reson. (Series B), 105:157-166, 1994.
• 17: A. S. Mildvaa and R. K. Gupta. Nuclear relaxation measurements of the geometry of enzyme-bound substrates and analogs. Methods m Enzymotogy, 46G:322-359, 1978.

INDEX TERMS

Keywords:
NMR, energy minimization, fold recognition, protein structure determination, protein threading