Strategies for encouraging individual achievement in introductory computer science courses

ABSTRACT

Students in introductory computer science courses often vary widely in background and ability. As a result, some students are bored by the pace of presentation, while others struggle to keep up. This paper describes our experience using open-ended assignments and programming contests to capture the interest of our strongest students without adversely affecting the educational experience for the other students in the class. This approach has been markedly successful, particularly for highly motivated students, who are often able to work well beyond the level of the class. The paper also includes a survey of student reactions to the various extra-credit opportunities, which indicates that many student value this component of the class even if they do not participate directly in these activities.

REFERENCES

• 1: Vivek Khera , Owen Astrachan , David Kotz, The internet programming contest: a report and philosophy, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, v.25 n.1, p.48-52, March 1993
• 2: Richard H. Austing , Bruce H. Barnes , Della T. Bonnette , Gerald L. Engel , Gordon Stokes, Curriculum '78: recommendations for the undergraduate program in computer science— a report of the ACM curriculum committee on computer science, Communications of the ACM, v.22 n.3, p.147-166, March 1979 [doi>10.1145/359080.359083]
• 3: Jon Bentley, Programming pearls: how to sort, Communications of the ACM, v.27 n.4, p.287-ff., April 1984 [doi>10.1145/358027.381121]
• 4: Kim B. Bruce, Attracting (& keeping) the best and the brightest: an entry-level course for experienced introductory students, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, v.26 n.1, p.243-247, March 1994
• 5: Coan, J. Basic BASIC. New York: Hayden Book Company, 1970.
• 6: Dewdney, A. K. Computer recreations. Scientific American,, February 1989.
• 7: Gardner, M. Mathematical games. Scientific American, February 1970.
• 8: John G. Kemeny , Thomas E. Kurtz, Basic Programming, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, 1980
• 9: Manes, S. and Andrews, P. Gates. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1993.
• 10: Nick Parlante , Owen Astrachan , Mike Clancy , Richard E. Pattis , Julie Zelenski , Stuart Reges, Nifty assignments panel, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, v.31 n.1, p.354-355, March 1999
• 11: Richard E. Pattis , Jim Roberts , Mark Stehlik, Karel the robot (2nd ed.): a gentle introduction to the art of programming, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, 1995
• 12: Eric S. Roberts, Using C in CS1: evaluating the Stanford experience, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, v.25 n.1, p.117-121, March 1993
• 13: Eric S. Roberts, The Art and Science of C: A Library-Based Introduction to Computer Science, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, 1994
• 14: Eric S. Roberts, A C-based graphics library for CS1, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, v.27 n.1, p.163-167, March 1995
• 15: Eric Roberts , John Lilly , Bryan Rollins, Using undergraduates as teaching assistants in introductory programming courses: an update on the Stanford experience, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, v.27 n.1, p.48-52, March 1995
• 16: Widmer, C. and Parker, J., Programming contests: what can they tell us?, Journal of Research on Computing in Education, Spring 1988.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  K. Computing Milieux
  K.3 COMPUTERS AND EDUCATION
      K.3.2 Computer and Information Science Education
          Subjects: Curriculum

Additional Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.1 MODELS AND PRINCIPLES

  K. Computing Milieux
  K.3 COMPUTERS AND EDUCATION
      K.3.2 Computer and Information Science Education
          Subjects: Computer science education

General Terms:
Design, Human Factors, Management, Measurement, Performance, Theory