APL design of graphic displays for motivation in distance education

ABSTRACT

APL is used in the experimental design of graphic displays to be applied in real-time, on-line education. These graphic displays are to be integrated in instructional dialogs. Our aim is to discover displays that will motivate students while they take computer mediated and distance learning courses. During the learning process, it is especially important for a student to receive feedback about his/her progress, continually and within a few tens of seconds of the most recent interaction. This feedback may indicate student performance relative to the recent past and also relative to their peers who have interacted with the same learning items. Compact and easy-to-interpret graphical or quantitative (partly numeric) displays of student progress are designed as character arrays. The rules for constructing these arrays are described conveniently in APL functions. Such functions specify a template each display and establish design correctness. The functions also allow flexible testing that reveals how easy it is to understand each display.

REFERENCES

• 1: ANDERSON, J. R., CONRAD, F. G. AND CORBETT, A. T. (1993). "The Lisp tutor and skill acquisition". In J. R. Anderson, (Ed.), Rules of the Mind (pp. 143-164). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• 2: BULL AND PAIN (1995) "Did I say what I think I said, and do you agree with me?" In Proceedings of ALl in Education (pp.501-508), Washington DC:AACE.
• 3: CORBETT, A.T. and ANDERSON, J.R. (1989). "Feedback timing and student control in the LISP Intelligent Tutoring System". Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on AI and Education, 64-72
• 4: CORBI~TT, A.T., ANDERSON, J. ~., CARVER, V.H. & BRANCOLINI, A. A. (1994). individual differences and predictive validity in student modeling. In A. Ram & K. Eiselt 0Sds) The proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
• 5: HARTLEY, J.R. (1996) Qualitative reasoning and conceptual change: computer-based support in understanding sciertce, in Volume XXX of Interactive Learning Environments
• 6: LEBIERE, C., ANDERSON, J. R., & REDER, L. M. (1994) Error modeling in the ACT-R production system. In The proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence
• 7: LEt, F.J., ANDERSON, J. R., & MATrSSA, M. P. (1995) Components of Dynamic Skill Acquisition, In The proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Hillsdate, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum {pp. 506-511}
• 8: PAIVA, A.M. and SELF, j.A. (1965). TAGUS - a user and learner modeling workbench, User Modeling and User adapted Interaction,4, pp 197-226
• 9: SELF, J. A. (1995). Dormorbile a vehicle for metacognition, in T.W. Chan and J.A. Self (eds), Emerging Computer Technologies in Education Charlottesville, AACE

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  D. Software
  D.2 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING

Additional Classification:
  K. Computing Milieux
  K.3 COMPUTERS AND EDUCATION

General Terms:
Design, Experimentation, Languages

Keywords:
display, distance education, feedback, graphic, histogram, motivation, online learning, plots