ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Selection procedures with standardized time series variance estimators
Full text PdfPdf (96 KB)
Source Winter Simulation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 31st conference on Winter simulation: Simulation---a bridge to the future - Volume 1 table of contents
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Pages: 382 - 388  
Year of Publication: 1999
ISBN:0-7803-5780-9
Authors
David Goldsman  School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA
William S. Marshall  School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGSIM: ACM Special Interest Group on Simulation and Modeling
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 0,   Downloads (12 Months): 3,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/324138.324252
What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Bechhofer, R. E., T. J. Santner and D. Goldsman. 1995. Design and Analysis of Experiments for Statistical Selection, Screening and Multiple Comparisons.New York: John Wiley.
 
2
Dudewicz, E. J., and S. R. Dalal. 1975. Allocation of obser-vations in ranking and selection with unequal variances. Sankhy~ a B37:28-78.
 
3
Dudewicz, E. J., and N. A. Zaino, Jr. 1977. Allowance for correlation in setting simulation run-length via ranking-andselection procedures. TIMS Studies in the Man-agement Sciences 7:51-61.
 
4
 
5
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
Goldsman, D., and B. L. Nelson. 1998b. Comparing systems via simulation. In Handbook of Simulation, ed. J. Banks, Chapter 8. New York: John Wiley.
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
Hsu, J. C. 1984. Constrained simultaneous confidence intervals for multiple comparisons with the best. Annals of Statistics 12:1136-1144.
 
15
Iglehart, D. L. 1977. Simulating stable stochastic systems, VII: Selecting the best system. TIMS Studies in the Management Sciences 7:37-50.
 
16
 
17
Matejcik, F. J., and B. L. Nelson. 1995. Two-stage multiple comparisons with the best for computer simulation. Operations Research 43:633-640.
 
18
 
19
 
20
Nelson, B. L., J. Swann, D. Goldsman and W.-M. Song. 1998. Simple procedures for selecting the best system when the number of alternatives is large. Technical Report. Dept. of IEMS, Northwestern Univ., Evanston, Illinois.
 
21
Rinott, Y. 1978. On two-stage selection procedures and related probability-inequalities. Comm. Stat.:Thy. and Meth. A7:799-811.
 
22
 
23
Schruben, L. W. 1983. Confidence interval estimation using standardized time series. Operations Research 31:1090-1108.
 
24
 
25
 
26
Wilcox, R. R. 1984. Atable for Rinott's selection procedure. J. Quality Technology 16:97-100.


Collaborative Colleagues:
David Goldsman: colleagues
William S. Marshall: colleagues