| A ranking and selection project: experiences from a university-industry collaboration |
| Full text |
Pdf
(95 KB)
|
| Source
|
Winter Simulation Conference
archive
Proceedings of the 31st conference on Winter simulation: Simulation---a bridge to the future - Volume 1
table of contents
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Pages: 83 - 92
Year of Publication: 1999
ISBN:0-7803-5780-9
|
|
Authors
|
|
David Goldsman
|
School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA
|
|
Barry L. Nelson
|
Department of Industrial Engineering & Management Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL
|
|
Tracy Opicka
|
Schneider National Inc., 3101 S. Packerland Dr., Green Bay, WI
|
|
A. B. Pritsker
|
Symix Systems, Inc., 9032 E. Cedar Waxwing Drive, Sun Lakes, AZ
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2, Downloads (12 Months): 24, Citation Count: 6
|
|
|
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
Bechhofer, R. E., S. Elmaghraby and N. Morse. 1959. A single-sample multiple-decision procedure for selecting the multinomial event which has the highest probability. Annals of Math. Stat. 30:102-119.
|
| |
2
|
Bechhofer, R. E., T. J. Santner and D. Goldsman. 1995. Design and Analysis of Experiments for Statistical Se-lection, Screening and Multiple Comparisons.New York: John Wiley.
|
| |
3
|
|
| |
4
|
Gupta, S. S. 1956. On a Decision Rule for a Problem in Ranking Means. Ph.D. Dissertation (Mimeo. Ser. No. 150). Inst. of Statist., Univ. of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
|
| |
5
|
Gupta, S. S. 1965. On some multiple decision (selection and ranking) rules. Technometrics 7:225-245.
|
| |
6
|
|
| |
7
|
Hsu, J. C. 1984. Constrained simultaneous confidence intervals for multiple comparisons with the best. Annals of Statistics 12:1136-1144.
|
| |
8
|
|
| |
9
|
Matejcik, F. J., and B. L. Nelson. 1995. Two-stage multiple comparisons with the best for computer simulation. Operations Research 43:633-640.
|
| |
10
|
|
| |
11
|
Nelson, B. L., J. Swann, D. Goldsman and W.-M. Song. 1998. Simple procedures for selecting the best system when the number of alternatives is large. Technical Report. Dept. of IEMS, Northwestern Univ., Evanston, Illinois.
|
| |
12
|
Opicka, T. L. 1999. Evaluating Ranking and Selection Procedures in Computer Simulation. M.S. Thesis, School of Industrial Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana.
|
| |
13
|
Opicka, T. L., and A. A. B. Pritsker. 1998. Scenario Selector User's Guide. SYMIX Systems/Pritsker Division, West Lafayette, Indiana.
|
| |
14
|
|
| |
15
|
Rinott, Y. 1978. On two-stage selection procedures and related probability-inequalities. Comm. Stat.:Thy. and Meth. A7:799-811.
|
| |
16
|
Wilcox, R. R. 1984. A table for Rinott's selection procedure. J. Quality Technology 16:97-100.
|
| |
17
|
Wilson, J. R., and A. A. B. Pritsker. 1978a. A survey of research on the simulation startup problem. Simulation 31:55-58.
|
| |
18
|
Wilson, J. R., and A. A. B. Pritsker. 1978b. A procedure for evaluating startup policies in simulation experiments Simulation 31:79-89.
|
CITED BY 6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael C. Fu , Sigrún Andradóttir , John S. Carson , Fred Glover , Charles R. Harrell , Yu-Chi Ho , James P. Kelly , Stephen M. Robinson, Integrating optimization and simulation: research and practice, Proceedings of the 32nd conference on Winter simulation, December 10-13, 2000, Orlando, Florida
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|