Toward adding knowledge to learning algorithms for indexing legal cases

ABSTRACT

Case-based reasoning systems have shown great promise for legal argumentation, but their development and wider availability are still slowed by the cost of manually representing cases. In this paper, we present our recent progress toward automatically indexing legal opinion texts for a CBR system. Our system SMILE uses a classification-based approach to find abstract fact situations in legal texts. To reduce the complexity inherent in legal texts, we take the individual sentences from a marked-up collection of case summaries as examples. We illustrate how integrating a legal thesaurus and linguistic information with a machine learning algorithm can help to overcome the difficulties created by legal language. The paper discusses results from a preliminary experiment with a decision tree learning algorithm. Experiments indicate that learning on the basis of sentences, rather than full documents, is effective. They also confirm that adding a legal thesaurus to the learning algorithm leads to improved performance for some, but not all, indexing concepts.

REFERENCES

• 1: Vincent Aleven , Kevin D. Ashley, Evaluating a learning environment for case-based argumentation skills, Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.170-179, June 30-July 03, 1997, Melbourne, Australia [doi>10.1145/261618.261650]
• 2: Vincent A. W. M. M. Aleven, Teaching case-based argumentation through a model and examples, 1997
• 3: L. Karl Branting, Building explanations from rules and structured cases, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, v.34 n.6, p.797-837, June 1991 [doi>10.1016/0020-7373(91)90012-V]
• 4: Stefanie Brüninghaus , Kevin D. Ashley, Using Machine Learning for Assigning Indices to Textual Cases, Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development, p.303-314, July 25-27, 1997
• 5: Burton, W. 1992. Legal Thesaurus. Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
• 6: Mark Craven , Dan DiPasquo , Dayne Freitag , Andrew McCallum , Tom Mitchell , Kamal Nigam , Seán Slattery, Learning to extract symbolic knowledge from the World Wide Web, Proceedings of the fifteenth national/tenth conference on Artificial intelligence/Innovative applications of artificial intelligence, p.509-516, July 1998, Madison, Wisconsin, United States
• 7: Jody J. Daniels , Edwina L. Rissland, What You Saw Is What You Want: Using Cases to Seed Information Retrieval, Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development, p.325-336, July 25-27, 1997
• 8: Graham Greenleaf , Andrew Mowbray , Geoffrey King , Simon Cant , Philip Chung, More than wyshful thinking: AustLII's legal inferencing via the World Wide Web, Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.47-55, June 30-July 03, 1997, Melbourne, Australia [doi>10.1145/261618.261629]
• 9: Lewis, D., and Riguette, M. 1994. A comparison of two learning algorithms for text categorization. In Proceedings of the Third Annual Symposium on Document Analysis and Information Retrieval (SDAIR-94).
• 10: Thomas M. Mitchell, Machine Learning, McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 1997
• 11: Marie-Francine Moens , Caroline Uyttendaele , Jos Dumortier, Abstracting of legal cases: the SALOMON experience, Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.114-122, June 30-July 03, 1997, Melbourne, Australia [doi>10.1145/261618.261643]
• 12: Moulinier, 1.; Raskinis, G.; and Ganascia, J. 1996. Text categorization: A symbolic approach. In Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Symposium on Document Analysis and Information Retrieval (SDAIR-96).
• 13: J. Ross Quinlan, C4.5: programs for machine learning, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, 1993
• 14: Rissland. E.; Skalak, D.: and Friedman, T. 1993. Case Retrieval Through Multiple Indexing and Heuristic Search. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth international Joint Conference on ArtiJicial Intelligence (IJCAI-93).
• 15: Sahami, M.; Craven, M.: Joachims, T.; and McCallum, A., eds. 1998. Learning for Text Categorizations, Papers from the AAAI-98 Workshop. AAAI Press.
• 16: Erich Schweighofer , Werner Winiwarter , Dieter Merkl, Information filtering: the computation of similarities in large corpora of legal texts, Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, p.119-126, May 21-24, 1995, College Park, Maryland, United States [doi>10.1145/222092.222205]
• 17: Smith, J.; Gelbart, D.; McCrimmon, K.; Athertin, B.; Ma&lean, J.: Shinehoft, M.; and Quintana. L. 1995. Artificial Intelligence and Legal Discourse: The Flexlaw Legal Text Management System. Artificiul Intelligence and Law 2(I0.
• 18: Staski, W. 1985. West's Legal 7'hesmrus and Dictionary. West Publishing.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  I. Computing Methodologies
  I.2 ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
      I.2.4 Knowledge Representation Formalisms and Methods
          Subjects: Relation systems

Additional Classification:
  I. Computing Methodologies
  I.2 ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

General Terms:
Algorithms, Design, Experimentation