ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
On the complexity of reachability and motion planning questions (extended abstract)
Full text PdfPdf (485 KB)
Source Annual Symposium on Computational Geometry archive
Proceedings of the first annual symposium on Computational geometry table of contents
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Pages: 62 - 66  
Year of Publication: 1985
ISBN:0-89791-163-6
Authors
Deborah A. Joseph  University of Wisconsin, Madison, 1210 W. Dayton St., Madison. WI
W. Harry Plantings  University of Wisconsin, Madison, 1210 W. Dayton St., Madison. WI
Sponsors
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
SIGGRAPH: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4,   Downloads (12 Months): 16,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/323233.323242
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In this paper we consider from a theoretical viewpoint the complexity of some reachability and motion planning questions. Specifically, we are interested in determining which generalizations of the basic mover's problem result in computationally intractable problems. It has been shown that for any set of motion-planning problems with bounded degree of freedom, there is a polynomial-time algorithm to solve the motion-planning problem (although the degree of the polynomial may be large), but the two most basic generalizations to the problem, multiple movable obstacles and conformable objects, result in much harder problems. It has been shown that the warehouseman's problem is P-space hard: in this paper we show that the reachability problem for one of the simplest types of conformable objects, a two-dimensional linear (“robot arm”) linkage, is P-space complete. In addition, we demonstrate some motion-planning problems that take exponential time.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
1. Howden, W. E., "The Sofa Problem," Comput J. 11 pp. 299- 301 (1968).
2
 
3
3. Reif, J. H., "Complexity of the Mover's Problem and Generalizations (Extended Abstract)." Proc. 20th IEEE FOCS. pp. 421- 427 (1979).
 
4
4. Brooks, R. A., "Planning collision-free motion for pick-and place operations." The International Journal of Research 2(4) (1983).
 
5
5. Schwartz, J. T. and M. Sharir. "On the 'Piano Movers' Problem - II. General Techniques for Computing Topological Properties of Real Algebraic Manifolds," Advances in Applied Math. 4 pp. 298-351 (1983).
 
6
6. Hopcroft, J. E., J. T. Schwartz. and M. Sharir. "On the complexity of motion planning for multiple independent objects: Pspace hardness of the "Warehouseman's problem"," Preprint (1983).
 
7
7. Hopcroft, J. E., D. A. Joseph. and S. H. Whitesides. "On the movement of robot arms in 2-dimensional bounded regions." Siam J. Comput. 14(2)(May, 1985).
 
8
 
9
9. Karp. R. M., "Reducibility among combinatorial problems." pp. 85-103 in Complexity of Computer Computations. ed. R. Miller, J. Thatcher. Plenum Press. New York (1972).


Collaborative Colleagues:
Deborah A. Joseph: colleagues
W. Harry Plantings: colleagues