ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
The Power of Pluralism for Automatic Program Synthesis
Full text PdfPdf (1.37 MB)
Source Journal of the ACM (JACM) archive
Volume 29 ,  Issue 4  (October 1982) table of contents
Pages: 1144 - 1165  
Year of Publication: 1982
ISSN:0004-5411
Author
Carl H. Smith  Department of Computer Science, University of Maryland, College Park, MD and Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 1,   Downloads (12 Months): 30,   Citation Count: 31
Additional Information:

references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/322344.322356
What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
ANGLUIN, D, AND SMITH, C.H A survey of inductive reference: Methods and theory. Submitted for pubhcation
 
2
BARZDIN, J.Two theorems on the limiting synthesis of functions. In Theory of Algorithms and Programs, J. Barzdin, Ed, Latvian State Umvermy, Riga, U.S.S R, 1974, pp 82-88.
 
3
BLUM, L., AND BLUM, M Toward a mathematical theory of inductive inference, lnf Comrol 28 (1975), 125-155.
 
4
CASE, J Periodicity in generations of automata Math. Syst. Theory 8 (1974), 15-32.
 
5
CASE, J., AND NGOMANGUELLE, S. Refinements of inductive reference by poppcrian machines. Kybernettka (to appear)
6
 
7
CASE, J., A~I~ SMrrn, C.Comparison of ~dentificatton criteria for machine inductive inference. Theor. Comput Sct 23, 1973.
 
8
DALE~, R On the error correcting power of pluralism in inductive inference. Toeh. Pep., Computer Science Dep., Univ. of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pa, 198 l, Theor. Comput. $ci. (to appear).
 
9
FELDMAN, J.Some decMability results on grammatteaI reference of best programs. Inf. Control 20 (1972), 244-262.
 
10
GOLD, E.M. Language Menttficattoa in the hmtt. Inf. Control 10 (1967), 447--474.
 
11
Kleene, S.On notation for ordinal numbers. J. Symbohc LogJc 3 (1938), 150-155.
 
12
LAUDAN, L.Progress and Its Problems. Umverslty of Cahforma Press, Berkeley, Calif., 1977.
 
13
 
14
MINICOZZl, E Some natural properties of strong-Ment~fication in inductive infe~nce. Treat. Cornput. Sc~ 2 (1976), 345-360.
 
15
MUSA, J. D A theory of software rehabihty and its application. IEEE Trans. Soflw. Eng. SE.L 3 (1975), 312-327.
 
16
PODNIEKS, K M. Comparing vanous concepts of funchon predietton, Part I. in Theory of Algorithms and Programs, J. Barzdln, Ed., Latvian State University, Riga, U.S.S.R., 1974~ pp. 68-81.
 
17
PODNIEKS, K M. Computational complexity of predicuon strategies. In Theory of Algorithms and Programs, J. Barzdin, Ed., Latvian State University, Riga, O S.S.R, 1977 (in Russian).
 
18
PUTNAM, H Piobablhty and confirmation. In Mathemancs, Matter and Method, Cambridge Universlty Press, Cambridge, England, 1975 Originally appeared in 1963 as a Voice of America l.,,eatre
 
19
ROGERs, H. JIL Godel numbermgs of parUal recursive functions. ~ Symbolic Logic 23 (1958), 331-341.
 
20
 
21
 
22
WIEHAGEN, R., AND LIi~PE, W Characteristic properues of recognizable elassos of recursiv~ functions. Elektron. informationsverarbe#ung Kybemetlk 12 (1974), 421-438 On German).

CITED BY  31