ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Digital Library logoTake a look at the new version of this page: [ beta version ]. Tell us what you think.
Algorithms for Scheduling Independent Tasks
Full text PdfPdf (913 KB)
Source Journal of the ACM (JACM) archive
Volume 23 ,  Issue 1  (January 1976) table of contents
Pages: 116 - 127  
Year of Publication: 1976
ISSN:0004-5411
Author
Sartaj K. Sahni  Department of Computer, Information and Control Sciences, University of Minnesota, 114 Lind Hall, Minneapolis, MN
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 12,   Downloads (12 Months): 141,   Citation Count: 46
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/321921.321934
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The following job sequencing problems are studied: (i) single processor job sequencing with deadlines, (ii) job sequencing on m-identical processors to minimize finish time and related problems, (iii) job sequencing on 2-identical processors to minimize weighted mean flow time. Dynamic programming type algorithms are presented to obtain optimal solutions to these problems, and three general techniques are presented to obtain approximate solutions for optimization problems solvable in this way. The techniques are applied to the problems above to obtain polynomial time algorithms that generate “good” approximate solutions.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
BRUNO, J., COVFMAN, E.G JR, AND SETHX, R. Algorithms for mimmizing mean flow time. Proc IFIP Cong. 1974, North-Holland Pub. Co., Amsterdam, pp 504-510.
 
3
COFFMAN, E.G., AND SETHI, R. Algorithms minimizing mean flow time: Schedule length properties. Comput. Sci. Dep., Pennsylvania State U., University Park, Pa., 1974.
 
4
CoNwAY, R.W, MAXWELL, W.L., AND MILLER, L.W Theory of Scheduling. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass, 1967.
 
5
FISHER, M.L. Optimal solution of scheduhng problems using Lagrangian multipliers (revised). Center for Mathematical Studies in Business and Economics Rep, U. of Chicago, Chicago, ill., March 1972
 
6
FISHER, M L OpUmal solution of scheduhng problems using Lagranglan multlphers. Pt. Ii. Presented at the Scheduling Symposium, North Carolina State U , Raleigh, N C., May 15-17, 1972.
 
7
GRAHAM, R.L. Bounds on multlprocessing timing anomahes. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 17, 2 (March 1969), 416-429.
8
9
 
10
JACKSON, J R. Scheduling a production line to minimize maximum tardiness Rep No. 43, Manag. Sci. Res Project, U of California, Los Angeles, Callf, July 1955
 
11
jOHNSON, D Approximation algorithms for combinatorial problems J Comput. Syst. Sc~ 9, 3 (Dec. 1974), 256-278
 
12
KARP, R M. Reduclbdity among combinatorial problems. In Complexity of Computer Computations, R.E Miller and J.W. Thatcher, Eds , Plenum Press, New York, 1972, pp. 85-103.
 
13
LAWLV.R, E L, AND MOOSE, J M A functmnal equation and ~ts application to resource allocation and sequenclng problems Manag Sci 16, 1 (Sept. 1969), 77-84
 
14
S~,HNt, S. Some subexpoaentially recognizable NP-complete languages. Computer Scmnce Tech Rep //74-14, U. of Minnesota, Mmneapohs, Minn., 1974.
 
15
SAHNI, S. Computationally related problems SIAM J. Com~ut $, 4 (Dec. 1974), 262-279
16
 
17
SAHNI, S, AND GONZaLr.Z, T. P-Complete problems and apprommate solutions Proc. IEEE 15th Annual Symposium on Switching and Automata Theory, Oct. 1974, 28-32.
 
18
ULLMAN, J.D Polynomial complete scheduling algorithms, j. Comput. Syst. Sc~. 10, ~ (Jan. 1975), 384-393.

CITED BY  46