ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Scheduling for Minimum Total Loss Using Service Time Distributions
Full text PdfPdf (732 KB)
Source Journal of the ACM (JACM) archive
Volume 21 ,  Issue 1  (January 1974) table of contents
Pages: 66 - 75  
Year of Publication: 1974
ISSN:0004-5411
Author
Kenneth C. Sevcik  Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Toronto 181, Ontario, Canada and University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 3,   Downloads (12 Months): 35,   Citation Count: 4
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/321796.321803
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

An analytic model of a single processor scheduling problem is investigated. The scheduling objective is to minimize the total loss incurred by a finite number of initially available requests when each request has an associated linear loss function. The assumptions of the model are that preemption is allowed with negligible loss of processor time, and that the distribution of actual service times is known for each class of requests. A request is associated with a class by any of its characteristics except its actual service time. A contrived example demonstrates that one reasonable scheduling rule does not always minimize expected total loss. The major results of the paper are the definition of a new scheduling rule based on the known service time distributions, and the proof that expected total loss is always minimized by using this new rule. Brief consideration is given to generalizations of the model in which new requests arrive randomly, and preemption requires a non-negligible amount of processor time.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
SMITH, W. E. Various optimizers for single stage production. Nay. Res. Logistics Quart. 8, 1 (March 1956), 59-66.
 
2
MCN~UG~TON, R.F. Scheduling with deadlines and loss furtctions. Manag. Sci. 6,1 (Oct. 1959), 1-12.
 
3
GaEENBERGER, M. The priority problem and computer time-sharing. Manag. Sci. 12, 11 (july 1966), 888-906.
 
4
ROTHKOPF, M. Scheduling with random service times. Manag. Sci. i~, 9 (May 1966), 707-713.
 
5
SCHRAGE, L.E. A proof of the optimality of the SRPT discipline. Oper. Res. 16, 3 (May 1968), 687-690.
 
6
SCHRAGE, L.E. Optimal scheduling rules for information processing systems. ICR Quart. Rep. No. 26, U. of Chicago, Chicago, Ill., Aug. 1970.
 
7
CHAZAN, D., KONHEIM, A. G., AND WEISS, B. A note on time-sharing. J. Comb. Theory 5, 4 (Dec. 1968), 344-369.
 
8
KONHEIM, A.G. A note on time-sharing. Rep. No. RC-1804, IBM Corp., Yorktown tteis;hts, New York, April 1967.
 
9
KONHEIM, A. G. A note on time-sharing with preferred customers. Z. Wahrscheinlichkeitslheorie Verw. Geb. 9 (1968), 112-130.
 
10
SEvcItc, K. C. The use of service time distributions in scheduling. Ph.D. diss., Comm. on Information Sciences, U. of Chicago, Sept. 1971.