ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
The Equivalence Problem of Simple Programs
Full text PdfPdf (693 KB)
Source Journal of the ACM (JACM) archive
Volume 17 ,  Issue 4  (October 1970) table of contents
Pages: 729 - 738  
Year of Publication: 1970
ISSN:0004-5411
Author
D. Tsichritzis  Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont., Canada. and Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 3,   Downloads (12 Months): 25,   Citation Count: 8
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/321607.321621
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Many problems, some of them quite meaningful, have been proved to be recursively unsolvable for programs in general. The paper is directed toward a class of programs where many decision problems are solvable. The equivalence problem has been proved to be unsolvable for the class L2 of loop programs defining the class of elementary functions. A solution is given for the class L1 defining the class of simple functions. Further, a set of other decision problems not directly connected with the equivalence problem is investigated. These problems are found again to be unsolvable for the class L2; but as before, a solution is given for the class L1. It is concluded, therefore, that there is a barrier of unsolvability between the classes L1 and L2.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
AXT, P. Iteration of primitive recursion, Abstract 597-182. Notices Amer. Math. Sac. 10, No. lPt. 1 (Jan. 1963), 112.
 
2
BERNSTEIN, A. J. Analysis of programs for parallel processing. IEEE Trans. EC-15, 5 (Oct' 1966), 757-763.
 
3
COBHAM Ai The intrinsic computational difficulty of functions, Proc. Congress on Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, Haifa, Israel, 1964 (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1964),, pp: 24-30.
 
4
DAvis, M. Computability and Unsolvability. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1958.
 
5
GRZEGORCZrK, A. Some classes of recursive functions. Rozprawy Matematycznc (Warsaw, poland) 4 (1953), 1-46.
 
6
GUARD, J. Lecture notes on recursive functions and mathematical machines. Princeton U., Princeton, N. J., 1967.
 
7
KLEENE, S.C. Introduction to MetamathenmHcs. Van Nostrand, Princeton, N. J., 1952.
 
8
MEYER, A. R. Depth of nesting of primitive recursion. Manuscript obtained through private correspondence.
9
 
10
. AND --. Computational complexity and program structure. IBM Res: Rep. RC 1817, May 15, 1967.
 
11
AND ..... A classification of functions by computational complexity. Proc. First Hawaii International Conference on Information Sciences and Systems, U. of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii, 1968, pp. 17-19.
 
12
 
13
PETER, R. Recursive Functions. Academic Press, New York, 1967.
 
14
RITCmE, R. Classes of primitive recursive functions based on Ackermann's function. Pacific J, Math. 15, 3 (1965), 1027-1037.
 
15
TSCHRITZm, D. Some unsolvable problems and partial solutions. Tech. Rep: NO. 69, Dep. of Elec. Eng.; Princeton Uii Princeton, N, J. (Summary in Proc. SecondHawaii International Conference on Information Sciences and Systems, U. of Hawaiil :HoZnolulu, Hawaii, 1969, pp. 703-706.