ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Subresultants and Reduced Polynomial Remainder Sequences
Full text PdfPdf (1.31 MB)
Source Journal of the ACM (JACM) archive
Volume 14 ,  Issue 1  (January 1967) table of contents
Pages: 128 - 142  
Year of Publication: 1967
ISSN:0004-5411
Author
George E. Collins  Computer Sciences Department, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin and Thomas J . Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, New York
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 68,   Citation Count: 73
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/321371.321381
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Let @@@@ be an integral domain, P(@@@@) the integral domain of polynomials over @@@@. Let P, Q ∈ P(@@@@) with m @@@@ deg (P) ≥ n = deg (Q) > 0. Let M be the matrix whose determinant defines the resultant of P and Q. Let Mij be the submatrix of M obtained by deleting the last j rows of P coefficients, the last j rows of Q coefficients and the last 2j+1 columns, excepting column mnij (0 ≤ ij < n). The polynomial Rj(x) = ∑ii=0 det (Mij)xi is the j-t subresultant of P and Q, R0 being the resultant. If b = £(Q), the leading coefficient of Q, then exist uniquely R, S ∈ P(@@@@) such that bm-n+1 P = QS + R with deg (R) < n; define R(P, Q) = R. Define Pi ∈ P(F), F the quotient field of @@@@, inductively: P1 = P, P2 = Q, P3 = RP1, P2 Pi-2 = R(Pi, Pi+1)/c&dgr;i-1+1i for i2 and ni+1 > 0, where ci = £(Pi), ni = deg (Pi) and &dgr;i = nini+1. P1, P2, …, Pk, for k ≥ 3, is called a reduced polynomial remainder sequence. Some of the main results are: (1) Pi ∈ P(@@@@) for 1 ≤ ik; (2) Pk = ± AkRnk-1-1, when Ak = &Pgr;k-2i-2c&dgr;i-1(&dgr;i-1)i; (3) c&dgr;k-1-1k Pk = ±Ak+1Rnk; (4) Rj = 0 for nk < j < nk-1 — 1. Taking @@@@ to be the integers I, or Pr(I), these results provide new algorithms for computing resultant or greatest common divisors of univariate or multivariate polynomials. Theoretical analysis and extensive testing on a high-speed computer show the new g.c.d. algorithm to be faster than known algorithms by a large factor. When applied to bivariate polynomials, for example this factor grows rapidly with the degree and exceeds 100 in practical cases.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
COLLINS, G.E. Polynomial reintinder sequences and determinani, s. Amer. Math. Mon. 73, 7 (Aug.-Sept. 1966), 708-712.
 
2
BROWN, W. S., HYDE, J. P., AND TAGUE, B.A. The ALPAK system for non-numerical algebra on a digital computer. Pt. I: Bell System Tech. J 412, 5 (Sept. 1963), 2081-2119. Pt. II: Ibid. 43, 2 (March 1964), 785-804. Pl. III: Ibid. S, 4 (July 1964), 1547-1562.
 
3
BOCHER, M. Introduclion to Higher Algebra. MacMillan Co., New York, 1907.
4
 
5
BODEWIG, E. Matrix Calculus (2nd Ed.). North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 1959.
6

CITED BY  73