ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
On Context-Free Languages
Full text PdfPdf (1.31 MB)
Source Journal of the ACM (JACM) archive
Volume 13 ,  Issue 4  (October 1966) table of contents
Pages: 570 - 581  
Year of Publication: 1966
ISSN:0004-5411
Author
Rohit J. Parikh  Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Masachusetts
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 16,   Downloads (12 Months): 114,   Citation Count: 49
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/321356.321364
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In this report, certain properties of context-free (CF or type 2) grammars are investigated, like that of Chomsky. In particular, questions regarding structure, possible ambiguity and relationship to finite automata are considered. The following results are presented: The language generated by a context-free grammmar is linear in a sense that is defined precisely. The requirement of unambiguity—that every sentence has a unique phrase structure—weakens the grammar in the sense that there exists a CF language that cannot be generated unambiguously by a CF grammar. The result that not every CF language is a finite automaton (FA) language is improved in the following way. There exists a CF language L such that for any L′L, if L′ is FA, an L″L can be found such that L″ is also FA, L′ ⊆ L″ and L″ contains infinitely many sentences not in L′. A type of grammar is defined that is intermediate between type 1 and type 2 grammars. It is shown that this type of grammar is essentially stronger than type 2 grammars and has the advantage over type 1 grammars that the phrase structure of a grammatical sentence is unique, once the derivation is given.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
BAR-HILLEL, Y., PRLES, M., AND SHAMIR, E. On formal properties of simple phrase structure grammars. Z. Phonetik, Sprachwissen. Komm. 15 (I961), 143-172; in Y. Bar-Hillel, Language and Information, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1965, pp. 116-150.
 
2
CHOMSKY, N. Three models for the description of lmguage. IRE trans, IT, 3 (1956), 113-.124.
 
3
----and MILIEh G. A. Fiaite stae languages, Inform, :nd Contr. 1 (19h3), 9b-..112.
 
4
---. On certai formal propertiets of grammars, inforem. and Contr.2 (1956) 137-167,
 
5
SCHEINBERG, S. On Booleal properties of phrase structure grammars Inform. and Contr, S (1960), 72---375.
 
6
SCHUTZENBERGER, M. P, Some remarks on Chomsky's eontext-free lsguges. MIT Quart, Progr. Rep. 63, Oct. 1961, p, 155ff.

CITED BY  49