ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Two-Tape Simulation of Multitape Turing Machines
Full text PdfPdf (1.36 MB)
Source Journal of the ACM (JACM) archive
Volume 13 ,  Issue 4  (October 1966) table of contents
Pages: 533 - 546  
Year of Publication: 1966
ISSN:0004-5411
Authors
F. C. Hennie  Department of Electrical Engineering Massachusetts, Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts
R. E. Stearns  Research and Development Center, General Electric Company, Schenectady, New York
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 20,   Downloads (12 Months): 125,   Citation Count: 29
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/321356.321362
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

It has long been known that increasing the number of tapes used by a Turing machine does not provide the ability to compute any new functions. On the other hand, the use of extra tapes does make it possible to speed up the computation of certain functions. It is known that a square factor is sometimes required for a one-tape machine to behave as a two-tape machine and that a square factor is always sufficient. The purpose of this paper is to show that, if a given function requires computation time T for a k-tape realization, then it requires at most computation time T log T for a two-tape realization. The proof of this fact is constructive; given any k-tape machine, it is shown how to design an equivalent two-tape machine that operates within the stated time bounds. In addition to being interesting in its own right, the trade-off relation between number of tapes and speed of computation can be used in a diagonalization argument to show that if T(n) and U(n) are two time functions such that inf T(n) log T(n) ÷ U(n) = 0 then there exists a function that can be computed within the time bound U(n) but not within the time bound T(n).


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
TURINO, A. IVL On computable numbers, with an application to the Entscheidungsproblem Proc. London Math. Soc. {2}, 42 (1938-37), 230-265; Correction, ibid., 43 (1937), 544-546.
 
2
HARTMANIS, J., AND STEARNS, R. E. 0II. the computational complexity of algorithms. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 117 (May 1965), 285-306.
 
3
HENNIE, F. C. One-tape, off-line Turing machine computations. Inform. and Contr. 8, 6 (Dec. 1965), 553-578.
 
4
YAMADA, H. Real-time computation and recursivc functions not real-time computable. IRE Trans. EC-11 (1962), 753-760.

CITED BY  29

Collaborative Colleagues:
F. C. Hennie: colleagues
R. E. Stearns: colleagues