ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Universality of Tag Systems with P = 2
Full text PdfPdf (227 KB)
Source Journal of the ACM (JACM) archive
Volume 11 ,  Issue 1  (January 1964) table of contents
Pages: 15 - 20  
Year of Publication: 1964
ISSN:0004-5411
Authors
John Cocke  International Business Machines Corp., Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, N.Y.
Marvin Minsky  Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Computation Center and Department of Electrical Engineering, Cambridge, Mass
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4,   Downloads (12 Months): 44,   Citation Count: 6
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/321203.321206
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

By a simple direct construction it is shown that computations done by Turing machines can be duplicated by a very simple symbol manipulation process. The process is described by a simple form of Post canonical system with some very strong restrictions. This system is monogenic: each formula (string of symbols) of the system can be affected by one and only one production (rule of inference) to yield a unique result. Accordingly, if we begin with a single axiom (initial string) the system generates a simply ordered sequence of formulas, and this operation of a monogenic system brings to mind the idea of a machine. The Post canonical system is further restricted to the “Tag” variety, described briefly below. It was shown in [1] that Tag systems are equivalent to Turing machines. The proof in [1] is very complicated and uses lemmas concerned with a variety of two-tape nonwriting Turing machines. The proof here avoids these otherwise interesting machines and strengthens the main result; obtaining the theorem with a best possible deletion number P = 2. Also, the representation of the Turing machine in the present system has a lower degree of exponentiation, which may be of significance in applications. These systems seem to be of value in establishing unsolvability of combinatorial problems.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
MINsKY, M. lecursive unsolvability of Post's probleln of Tag and other topics in theory of Turig moehirms. Ann. Math. 7g, 3 (Nov. 1961), 437-455.
 
2
For further results along these lines, see: WANG, HAO. Tag systems and Lag systems. To apper.
 
3
MINgKY, M, Size and sgrtwture of universal Turing machines using Tag systems: a 4-symbol 7-share machine. In Proc. Symposium a Recursive FuncZion Theory, Am. Math. See., Providence, R, I., 1962.
4
5


Collaborative Colleagues:
John Cocke: colleagues
Marvin Minsky: colleagues