ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A performance evaluation of the mobile agent paradigm
Full text PdfPdf (995 KB)
Source Conference on Object Oriented Programming Systems Languages and Applications archive
Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGPLAN conference on Object-oriented programming, systems, languages, and applications table of contents
Denver, Colorado, United States
Pages: 306 - 313  
Year of Publication: 1999
ISBN:1-58113-238-7
Also published in ...
Authors
Daniel Hagimont  Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en, Automatique (INRIA), Sirac Laboratory, INRIA Rhône-Alpes, 655 avenue de l'Europe, 38330 Montbonnot Saint-Martin, France
L. Ismail  Institut National Polytechnique de Grenoble, (INPG), Sirac Laboratory, INRIA Rhône-Alpes, 655 avenue de l'Europe, 38330 Montbonnot Saint-Martin, France
Sponsor
SIGPLAN: ACM Special Interest Group on Programming Languages
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 3,   Downloads (12 Months): 38,   Citation Count: 12
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/320384.320415
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper presents a performance evaluation of the mobile agent paradigm in comparison to the client/server paradigm. This evaluation has been conducted on top of the Java environment, using respectively RMI, the Aglets mobile agents platform and a mobile agents prototype that we implemented. The measurements give the cost of the basic mechanisms involved in the implementation of a mobile agent platform, and a comparative evaluation of the two considered models (client/server and mobile agents) through two application scenarios. The results show that significant performance improvements can be obtained using mobile agents.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
3
 
4
Chess, D., C. Harrison, and A. Kershenbaum. Mobile Agents: are they a good idea ?. IBM Research Report, RC 19887, December 1994.
 
5
Engler, D.R., M.F. Kaashoek, and J. O'Toole. Exokernel: An Operating System Architecture for Application-Level Resource Management. 15th
 
6
Symposium on Operating Systems Principles (SOSP), Copper Mountain Resort, Colorado, December 1995.
 
7
Gosling, J., and H. McGilton. The Java Language Environment: a White Paper, Sun Microsystems Inc., 1995. http://java.sun.com/whitePaperljavawhitepaper- 1.html.
 
8
Gray, R. A transportable agent system. In Proceedings of the CIKM Workshop on Intelligent Information Agents. Fourth International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM95), Baltimore, Maryland, December 1995.
9
 
10
 
11
Milojicic, D. S., W. LaForge, and D. Chauhan. Mobile Objects and Agents (MOA). 4th USENIX Conference on Object-Oriented Technologies and Systems, Avril 1998.
 
12
OMG. The Common Object Request Broker: Architecture and Specification, OMG Document Number 91.12.1, Revision 1.1, December 1991.
 
13
Riggs, R., J. Waldo, A. Wollrath, and K. Bharat. Pickling State in the Java System. Computing Systems, 9(4), 1996.
 
14
Straf~er, M. and Markus Schwehm. A Performance Model for Mobile Agent Systems. Distributed Processing Techniques and Applications DPPTA'97. Volume II, Editor H.R. Arabnia, Las Vegas 1997, pages 1132-1140.
 
15
Venners, B. Under the Hood: The Architecture of aglets. March 1997. http://www.trl.ibm.co.jp/aglets/.
 
16
White, J. E. Telescript Technology: The Foundation for the Electronic Market-place. General Magic Inc., Mountain View, CA, 1994.
 
17
Wollrath, A., R. Riggs, and J. Waldo. A Distributed Object Model for the Java System. Computing Systems, 9(4), pp. 291-312, 1996.

CITED BY  12

Collaborative Colleagues:
Daniel Hagimont: colleagues
L. Ismail: colleagues