System level concurrency control for distributed database systems

ABSTRACT

A distributed database system is one in which the database is spread among several sites and application programs “move” from site to site to access and update the data they need. The concurrency control is that portion of the system that responds to the read and write requests of the application programs. Its job is to maintain the global consistency of the distributed database while ensuring that the termination of the application programs is not prevented by phenomena such as deadlock. We assume each individual site has its own local concurrency control which responds to requests at that site and can only communicate with concurrency controls at other sites when an application program moves from site to site, terminates, or aborts. This paper presents designs for several distributed concurrency controls and demonstrates that they work correctly. It also investigates some of the implications of global consistency of a distributed database and discusses phenomena that can prevent termination of application programs.

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

	1	ACHIM, F. Data base networks--an overview. Management Informatics 3, 1 (1974), 13-29.
	2	M. M. Astrahan , M. W. Blasgen , D. D. Chamberlin , K. P. Eswaran , J. N. Gray , P. P. Griffiths , W. F. King , R. A. Lorie , P. R. McJones , J. W. Mehl , G. R. Putzolu , I. L. Traiger , B. W. Wade , V. Watson, System R: relational approach to database management, ACM Transactions on Database Systems (TODS), v.1 n.2, p.97-137, June 1976 [doi>10.1145/320455.320457]
	3	Rudolf Bayer, On the Integrity of Data Bases and Resource Locking, Data Base Systems, Proceedings, 5th Informatik Symposium, p.339-361, September 24-26, 1975
	4	Lawrence A. Bjork, Recovery scenario for a DB/DC system, Proceedings of the annual conference, p.142-146, August 27-29, 1973, Atlanta, Georgia, United States [doi>10.1145/800192.805695]
	5	CHAMBEI~IAN, D.D., BOYCE, R.F., AND T}~AIGER, I.L. A deadlock-free scheme for resource locking in a database environment. Information Processing 74, North-Holland Pub. Co., Amsterdam, 1974, pp. 340-343.
	6	W. W. Chu , G. Ohlmacher, Avoiding deadlock in distributed data bases, Proceedings of the 1974 annual conference, p.156-160, January 1974 [doi>10.1145/800182.810396]
	7	E. G. Coffman , M. Elphick , A. Shoshani, System Deadlocks, ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), v.3 n.2, p.67-78, June 1971 [doi>10.1145/356586.356588]
	8	P. J. Courtois , F. Heymans , D. L. Parnas, Concurrent control with “readers” and “writers”, Communications of the ACM, v.14 n.10, p.667-668, Oct. 1971 [doi>10.1145/362759.362813]
	9	Charles T. Davies, Jr., Recovery semantics for a DB/DC system, Proceedings of the annual conference, p.136-141, August 27-29, 1973, Atlanta, Georgia, United States [doi>10.1145/800192.805694]
	10	DEPI'E, M.E., AND F~~, J.P. Distributed data bases--a summary of research. Computer Networks 1 (I976), 130-138.
	11	K. P. Eswaran , J. N. Gray , R. A. Lorie , I. L. Traiger, The notions of consistency and predicate locks in a database system, Communications of the ACM, v.19 n.11, p.624-633, Nov. 1976 [doi>10.1145/360363.360369]
	12	EVEREST, G.C. Concurrent update control and data base integrity. In Data Base Management, J.W. Klimbie and K.L. Koffeman, Eds., North-Holland Pub. Co., Amsterdam, 1974, pp. 241-270.
	13	Foss(~M, B.M. Database integrity as provided for by a particular data base management system. In Data Base Management, J.W. Klimbie and K.L. Koffeman, Eds., North-Holland Pub. Co., Amsterdam, 1974, pp. 271-288.
	14	GENEFcAL ELECTRIC RESEARCH AND DEVEI,OPMENT CENTER. MADMAN User Manual. Schenectady, N.Y., I976.
	15	G{~AY, J. Locking in a decentralized computer system. IBM Res. Rep. RJ i346, IBM Res. Lab., San Jose, Calif., Feb. 1974.
	16	GJ~AY, J.N., LOE(IE, R.A., AND P{JTZO{.U, G.R. Granularity of locks in a shared data base. Proc. Int. Conf. on Very Large Data Bases, Framingham, Mass., Sept. 1975, pp. 428-451 (available from ACM, New York).
	17	GREW, I. Formal problem specifications for readers and writers scheduling. Proc. MRI Symp. on Comptr. Software Eng., Polytechnic Inst. of New York, 1976.
	18	HAWLEY, D.A., KNOWLES, J.S., AND TOZEI~, E.E. Database consistency and the CODASYL DBTG proposals. Computer J. 18, 3 (Aug. 1975), 206-212.
	19	C. A. R. Hoare, Monitors: an operating system structuring concept, Communications of the ACM, v.17 n.10, p.549-557, Oct. 1974 [doi>10.1145/355620.361161]
	20	JOHNSON, P.R., AND THOMAS, R.H. The maintenance of duplicate databases. Doc. #31507, Network Information Center (NIC), Jan. 1975.
	21	KING, P.F., AND COLLMEYER, AIJ. Database sharing--an efficient mechanism for supporting concurrent processes. Proc. AFIPS I973 NCC, Vol. 42, AFIPS Press, Montvale, N.J., 1973, pp. 271-275.
	22	LAMPORT, L. Time clocks and the ordering of events in a distributed system. Massachusetts Computer Associates, Wakefield, Mass., March 1976.
	23	Philip P. Macri, Deadlock detection and resolution in a CODASYL based data management system, Proceedings of the 1976 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data, June 02-04, 1976, Washington, D.C.
	24	SCHLAGETEt~, G. Access synchronization and deadlock-analysis in database systems: An implementation-oriented approach. Inform. Syst. 1 (I975), 97-102.
	25	SEKINO, L.C. Multiple concurrent updates. Proc. Int. Conf. on Very Large Data Bases, Framingham, Mass., Sept. 1975, pp. 505-507 (available from ACM, New York).
	26	STEAkNS, R.E., LEWIS, P.M. II, AND ROSENKRANTZ, D.J. Concurrency controls for database systems. Proc. 17th Annual Symp. on Foundations of Comptr. Sci., Houston, Tex., Oct. 1976, pp. 19-32 (available from IEEE, Long Beach, Calif.).
	27	STONEBRAKER, M., AND NEUHOLD, E. A distributed data base version of INGRES. Proc. Second Berkeley Workshop on Distributed Data Manage. and Comptr. Networks, May 1977, pp. 19-36.