ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Extending the database relational model to capture more meaning
Full text PdfPdf (2.71 MB)
Source ACM Transactions on Database Systems (TODS) archive
Volume 4 ,  Issue 4  (December 1979) table of contents
Pages: 397 - 434  
Year of Publication: 1979
ISSN:0362-5915
Author
E. F. Codd  IBM Research Lab, San Jose, CA
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 45,   Downloads (12 Months): 312,   Citation Count: 339
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/320107.320109
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

During the last three or four years several investigators have been exploring “semantic models” for formatted databases. The intent is to capture (in a more or less formal way) more of the meaning of the data so that database design can become more systematic and the database system itself can behave more intelligently. Two major thrusts are clear. (1) the search for meaningful units that are as small as possible—atomic semantics; (2) the search for meaningful units that are larger than the usual n-ary relation—molecular semantics. In this paper we propose extensions to the relational model to support certain atomic and molecular semantics. These extensions represent a synthesis of many ideas from the published work in semantic modeling plus the introduction of new rules for insertion, update, and deletion, as well as new algebraic operators.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
AHO, A. H., BEERI, C., AND ULLMAN, J. The theory of joins in relational databases. Proc. 19th IEEE Symp. on Foundations of Comptr. Sci., 1977.
2
 
3
BEERI, C., BERNSTEIN, P., AND GOODMAN, N. A sophisticate's introduction to database normalization theory. Proc. Int. Conf. on Very Large Data Bases, Berlin, Sept. 1978, pp. 113-124.
 
4
CADIOV, J. M. On semantic issues in the relational model of data. Proc. 5th Syrup. on Math. Foundations of Comptr. Sci., 1976, Gdansk, Poland, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 45, Springer-Verlag, pp. 23-38.
5
 
6
CODD, E. V. Further normalization of the database relational model. In Database Systems, Courant Computer Science Symposia 6, R. Rustin, Ed., Prentice-Hall, Enghwood Cliffs, N.J., 1971, pp. 65-98.
 
7
CODD, E. F. Recent investigations in relational database systems. Information Processing 74, North-Holland Pub. Co., Amsterdam, 1974, pp. 1017-1021.
 
8
CODD, E. F. Understanding relations (Installment No. 7). FDT (Bulletin of ACM SIGMOD) 7, 3- 4 (Dec. 1975), 23-28.
 
9
CODD, E. F. Extending the database relational model. Invited talk presented at the Australian Comptr. Sci. Conf., Hobart, Tasmania, Feb. 1-2, 1979.
10
11
 
12
FALKENBERG, E. Concepts for modelling information. In Modelling in Data Base Management Systems, G. M. Nijssen, Ed., North-Holland Pub. Co., Amsterdam, 1976.
 
13
GOLDSTEIN, R. C., AND STRNAD, A. L. The MACAIMS data management system. Proc. 1970 ACM SICFIDET Workshop on Data Description and Access, Houston, Tex., Nov. 15-16, 1970.
 
14
HALL, P., OWLETT, J., AND TODD, S. Relations and entities, in Modelling in Data Base Management Systems, G. M. Nijssen, Ed., North-Holland Pub. Co., Amsterdam, 1976.
15
 
16
H~ATH, I. J. Private communication, April 1971.
 
17
HEMPHILL, L. G., AND RHYNE, J. R. A model for knowledge representation in natural language query systems. IBM Res. Rep. RJ2304, IBM Res. Lab., San Jose, Calif., Sept. 1978.
 
18
HENDRIX, G. G. Encoding knowledge in partitioned networks. Tech. Note 164, SRI International, Menlo Park, Calif., June 1978.
 
19
JORDAN, D. E. Implementing production systems with relational data bases. Proc. ACM Pacific Conf., San Francisco, Calif., April 1975.
20
 
21
LACRoIx, M., AND PIROTTE, A. Example queries in relational languages. Tech. Note N107, Manufacture Belge de Lampes et de Materiel Electronique, Brussels, Belgium, Jan. 1976; revised Sept. 1977.
22
 
23
MERRETT, T. H. Relations as programming language elements. Inform. Processing, Lett. 6, I (Feb. 1977), 29-33.
 
24
NIJSSEN, G. M., Ed. Modelling in Database Management Systems. North-Holland Pub. Co., Amsterdam, 1976.
 
25
 
26
PZROTTE, A. The entity-property-association model: An information-oriented database model. Rep. R343, Manufacture Belge de Lampes et de Materiel Electronique, Brussels, Belgium, March 1977.
 
27
PIROTTE, A. Linguistic aspects of high-level relational languages. Rep. R367, Manufacture Beige de Lampes et de Materiel Electronique, Brussels, Belgium, Jan. 1978.
 
28
REITER, it. On closed world data bases. In Logic and Data Bases, H. GaUaire and J. Minker, Eds., Plenum Press, New York, 1978.
29
 
30
RISSANEN, J. Theory of relations for databases--a tutorial survey. Proc. Symp. on Math. Foundations of Comptr. Sci., 1978, Zakopane, Poland, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer-Verlag, pp. 536-551.
 
31
RoussoPOULOS, N., AND MYLOPOULOS, J. Using semantic networks for database management. Proc. Int. Conf. on Very Large Databases, Sept. 1975.
32
33
34
 
35
SOWA, J. F. Conceptual structures for a database interface. IBM J. Res. Develop. 20, 4 (July 1976), 336-357.
 
36
37
 
38
TODD, S. J. P. The Peterlee relational test vehicle. IBM Syst. J. 15, 4 (1976), 285-308.
 
39
ULLMAN, J. D. Theory of Relational Databases. To appear.
40
 
41
WHITNEY, V. K. M. RDMS: A relational data management system. Proc. Fourth Int. Symp. on Comptr. and Inform. Sci., Miami Beach, Fla., Dec. 14-16, 1972, Plenum Press, New York.
 
42
 
43
WONG, H. K. T., AND MYLOPOULOS, J. Two views of data semantics: A survey of data models in artificial intelligence and database management, lnformatics 15, 3 (Oct. 1977), 344-383.
 
44
45
 
46
ZLOOF, M. M. Query-by-example: A data base language. IBM Syst. J. 16, 4 (1977), 324-343,

CITED BY  339