ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A path-oriented routing strategy for packet switching networks with end-to-end protocols
Full text PdfPdf (650 KB)
Source Applications, Technologies, Architectures, and Protocols for Computer Communication archive
Proceedings of the ninth symposium on Data communications table of contents
Whistler Moutain, British Columbia, Canada
Pages: 165 - 171  
Year of Publication: 1985
ISBN:0-89791-164-4
Also published in ...
Authors
R. Aubin  BNR, P.O. Box 3511, Station C, Ottawa, Ontario, K1Y 4H7 Canada
P. Ng  BNR, P.O. Box 3511, Station C, Ottawa, Ontario, K1Y 4H7 Canada
Sponsor
SIGCOMM: ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 19,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/319056.319038
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

A path-oriented routing strategy is proposed for packet switching networks with end-to-end internal protocols. It allows switch pairs to communicate over multiple paths (for better network throughput), while maintaining knowledge of user connections at the network's endpoints only. The most significant aspect of this strategy lies in its flow assignment method. A distributed loop-free shortest path algorithm assigns a number to a path at the time it is created and this number remains valid through shortest path changes. Consequently, existing traffic can be maintained on existing paths, while new traffic is assigned to the current shortest paths. Stable multiple path routing is thus achieved without packet disordering. Abnormal conditions such as trunk failure and recovery and trunk congestion are dealt with by tagging routing updates with update causes. Simulation of this routing strategy shows that maximum network throughput (under a certain congestion constraint) can be increased substantially compared to a single path routing strategy.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Ahuja, V. "Routing and Flow Control in Systems Network Architecture." IBM $yst. d. Ye, 2 (1979): 298-314.
 
2
Aubin, R. "Including Processing and Propagation Delay to Routing in Packet Switching Networks." PPO~. Int. Conf. C~mm~nicati~ns' Chicago, 1985, pp. 107-111.
 
3
Bertsekas, D.P. "Optimal Routing and Flow Control Methods for Communication Networks." In Analysis and Optimization of Systems, pp, 615-643. Edited by F. Bensoussan and J.-L. Lions. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1983.
 
4
 
5
Jaffe, J.M. and Moss, F.H. "A Responsive Distributed Routing Algorithm for Computer Networks." I~EE lnans. Communic. COM-3d, 7 (July 1982): 1758-1762.
 
6
Kaliszewski, J.M. "/he New Routing Algorithm on the SITA Data Transport Network." In Pepformance of Computer-Communication Systems, pp. 415-431. Edited by H. Rudin and W. Bux. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1984.
 
7
Kleinrock, L. "Principles and Lessons in Packet Communications." PPOC. I~~E 66, 11 (November 1978): 1320-1329.
 
8
Majithia, J.C.; Irland, M.; Grange, J.-L.; Cohen, M.; and O'Donnell, C.O. "Experiments in Congestion Control Techniques." In {}OW ContPo} in ComputeP NetwoPk$, pp. 211-234. Edited by J.-L. Grange and M. Glen. Amsterdam: North-Holland, i979.
 
9
Merlin, D.M. and Segall, A. "A Failsafe Distributed Routing Protocol." fEE{ Tnan$. Communic. C~X-27, 9 (September 1979): 1280-1287.
 
10
Seligman, D.R. "Traffic Routing in a Computer Network." ?8PfoPNance 7, 2 (April 1984): 59-64.
11