ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Simulation, animation, and shop-floor control
Full text PdfPdf (479 KB)
Source Winter Simulation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 19th conference on Winter simulation table of contents
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Pages: 649 - 653  
Year of Publication: 1987
ISBN:0-911801-32-4
Authors
Cynthia Erikson  Systems Modeling Corp., 248 Calder Way, Suite 300, State College, PA
Antonie Vandenberge  Systems Modeling Corp., 248 Calder Way, Suite 300, State College, PA
Trevor Miles  Systems Modeling Corp., 248 Calder Way, Suite 300, State College, PA
Sponsor
SIGSIM: ACM Special Interest Group on Simulation and Modeling
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4,   Downloads (12 Months): 18,   Citation Count: 7
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/318371.318678
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

It is often desirable to link shop-floor hardware directly to a discrete-event simulation model or graphical animation. Four situations in which this type of arrangement may be beneficial are identified here, and several mechanisms for implementation are discussed. A primary application involves testing the planned control logic for a specific manufacturing system. In this case, a simulation model, linked directly to one or more programmable controllers, provides the controller(s) with system scenarios under which they are expected to perform and produce a response. A second application is system emulation, where real-time data is used to drive an animation. In this way, a visual representation of system status is provided to monitor shop-floor activity. This may be especially useful in situations where the system is monitored from a remote or central control area. The ability to simulate ahead from current shop-floor status is the foundation for the final two applications that are considered here. Used for contingency control, the effects of alternate control strategies which may be imposed when some critical event occurs, e.g. machine breakdown or expedited orders, may be studied and evaluated. Finally, alternate production schedules may be simulated and compared when the initial schedule is prepared, or updated and resimulated as the shop-floor situation changes.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Baker, Kelmeth R. (1974). Introduction to Sequencing and Scheduling. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
2

CITED BY  7

Collaborative Colleagues:
Cynthia Erikson: colleagues
Antonie Vandenberge: colleagues
Trevor Miles: colleagues