ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Concurrent simulation: an alternative to distributed simulation
Full text PdfPdf (811 KB)
Source Winter Simulation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 18th conference on Winter simulation table of contents
Washington, D.C., United States
Pages: 417 - 423  
Year of Publication: 1986
ISBN:0-911801-11-1
Author
Douglas W. Jones  Department of Computer Science, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
Sponsor
SIGSIM: ACM Special Interest Group on Simulation and Modeling
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4,   Downloads (12 Months): 15,   Citation Count: 9
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/318242.318468
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The advent of a new generation of multiprocessors allows new approaches to parallel simulation. Previous work in this area has concentrated on distributed simulation; this approach uses spatial decomposition to allow simulations to be run on networks of machines, where the message flow between processors in the network is related closely to the topology of the system being simulated. This paper presents an alternate approach, concurrent simulation, which is based on temporal decomposition. This allows natural use to be made of the shared memory facilities and load-balancing capabilities of the new multiprocessors, and it overcomes some fundamental limitations of the distributed approach.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Baskett, F. and J. Hennessy j. (1986). Small Shared-Memory Multiprocessor s. 231, 963-967.
 
2
Bell, C. G. (1985). Multis: A New Class of Mul tiprocessor Computers. ~ 2~, 462-467.
3
 
4
Chandy, K. M., and Misra, J. (1979). Distributed Simulation: A Case Study. /~ ~. on Software Engineer in~g SE-5, 440 -452.
 
5
Dijkstra, E. W. (1971). Hierarchical Ordering of sequential Processes. Informatica i, 115-13 8.
 
6
Jones, D. W. (1985). Concurrent Operations on Priority Queues. submitted for publication.
7
 
8
Kuck, D. J., et al. (1986). Parallel Supercomputing Today and the Cedar Approach. 2~, 967-97 4.
 
9
O' Keel e, R. M. (1986) . The Three-Phase Approach. In: Proceedings ~i~ /~ Simulation Conference.
 
10
 
11
Overstreet, C. M. (1986). World View Based Discrete Event Model Simplification. In: Modellina and Simulation MeJuhDd~loqv in the Artificial /d%telligence Y~A. North Holland, Amsterdam.
 
12
 
13
Peacock, J. K., Wong, J. W. and Manning, E. G.(197 9b) . Distributed Simulation Using a Network of Processors. Computer Netw~ks 3, 44-56.
14

CITED BY  9