ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Tutorial on indifference-zone normal means ranking and selection procedures
Full text PdfPdf (439 KB)
Source Winter Simulation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 18th conference on Winter simulation table of contents
Washington, D.C., United States
Pages: 370 - 375  
Year of Publication: 1986
ISBN:0-911801-11-1
Author
David Goldsman  School of ISyE, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA
Sponsor
SIGSIM: ACM Special Interest Group on Simulation and Modeling
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4,   Downloads (12 Months): 15,   Citation Count: 4
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/318242.318461
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This tutorial concerns the ranking and selection problem of choosing that one of k normal populations (with common known variance) which has the largest mean. We discuss a number of procedures which guarantee a specified probability of selecting the correct population. We concentrate on so-called indifference-zone procedures.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Bechhofer, R.E. (1954). "A Single-Sample Multiple Decision Procedure for Ranking Means of Normal Populations with Known Variances." Ann. llath. Sta~:., ~5, 16-39.
 
2
Bechhofer, R.E. and D. Golds~an (1986). Technical Report (in preparation), School of OR&IE, Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY.
 
3
Bechhofer, R.E., J. Kiefer, and N. Sobel (1968). Sequential Identification and Ranking Procedures. The Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.
 
4
Fabian, V. (1974). "Note on Anderson's Sequential Procedures with Triangular Boundary." Annals of Statistics, ~, 170-175.
 
5
Gibbons, J.D., I. Olkin, and M. Sobel (1977). SeleetinE and Ordering Populations. John ~iley, New York.
 
6
7
 
8
Gupta, S.S. (1956). On a Decision Rule for a Problem in Rankin# lleans. Ph.D. Dissertation (Mimeo Ser. No. 150). Inst. of Statist., Univ. of N. Carolina, Chapel {till.
 
9
Gupta, S.S. and S. Panchapakesan (1979). Multiple Decision Procedures. John ~iley, New York.
 
10
Hartmann, M. (1986). "An Improvement on Paulson's Sequential Procedure for Selecting the Largest Normal Mean." Technical Report, School of OR&IE, Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY.
 
11
Paulson, E. (1964). "A Sequential Procedure for Selecting the Population with the Largest Mean from k Normal Populations." Ann. Math. Seat,, 35, 174-180.
 
12
Ramberg, J.S. ( 1966). A Comparison o{ the Performance Characteristics o{ Two Sequential Procedures for Ranking Means of Normal Populations. Master's Thesis, School of OR&IE, Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY.
 
13
Tamhane, A.C. and R.E. Bechhofer (1977). "A Two- St age Minimax Procedure with Screening for Selecting the Largest Normal Mean." Comm. Stat. - Theor. Neth., A6, 1003-1033.
 
14
Tamhane, A.C. and R.E. Bechhofer (1979). "A Two- Stage Minimax Procedure with Screening for Selecting the Largest Normal Mean (II): An Improved PCS Lower Bound and Associated Tables." Comm. S(~at. -Theor. Meth., k8, 337-358.