ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Variance reduction methods
Full text PdfPdf (887 KB)
Source Winter Simulation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 18th conference on Winter simulation table of contents
Washington, D.C., United States
Pages: 60 - 68  
Year of Publication: 1986
ISBN:0-911801-11-1
Author
Russell C. H. Cheng  Department of Mathematics, University of Wales Institute of Science and Technology, Colum Drive, Cardiff, CF1 3EU, U.K.
Sponsor
SIGSIM: ACM Special Interest Group on Simulation and Modeling
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 8,   Downloads (12 Months): 23,   Citation Count: 3
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/318242.318261
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

A computer simulation model is unusual in that the random error is under the total control of the experimenter. Variance reduction methods aim to take advantage of this to improve experimental accuracy. The fundamental ideas behind the most important of these methods will be described and illustrated with simple examples.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
 
3
Cheng, R.C.H. (1984). Generation of inverse Gaussian variates with given sample mean and dispersion. Applied Statistics, 33, 309-316.
 
4
Cheng, R.C.H. and Feast, G.M. (1980). Control variables with known mean and variance. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 31, 51-56.
 
5
Fieller, E.C. and Hartley, H.O. (1954). Sampling with control variables, Biometrika, 41, 494-501.
 
6
7
 
8
Hammersley, J.M. and Handscomb, D.C. (1964). Monte Carlo Methods. Methuen & Co. Ltd., London.
 
9
Kleijnen, J.P.C. (1974). Statistical Techniques in ~imu lat ion, Part I. Marcel Dekker, New Yo~ck.
 
10
Lavenberg, S.S. and Welch, P.D. (1981) . A perspective on the use of control variables to increase the efficiency of Monte Carlo simulations. Management Science, 27, 322-335.
 
11
 
12
 
13
Nelson, B.L. and Schmeiser, B.TT. (1985) . Decomposition of some well-known varlance reduction techniques. Research Memorandum 84-6, School o~- Industrial Engineering, Purdue Univers:_ty, West Lafayette, Indiana.
 
14
Ross, S.M. (19801 . Introduction to Probability Models, 2nd ed, Academic Press, New York.
 
15
Schruben, L.W. and Margolin, B.H. (1978). Pseudorandom number assignment in statistically designed simulation and distribution s~npling experiments. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 73, 504-520.
 
16
 
17
Wilson, J.R. (1984). Variance reduction techniques fo~ digital simulation. American Journal of Mathematical and Management Sciences, 4, 277-312.
 
18
Wilson, J.R. and Pritsker, A.A.B. (1984) . Varlance reduction in queueing simulation using general~zed concoL%itant variables. Journal of Stavistical Computation and Simulation, 19~ 129-153.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Russell C. H. Cheng: colleagues