ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Credibility assessment of simulation results
Full text PdfPdf (632 KB)
Source Winter Simulation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 18th conference on Winter simulation table of contents
Washington, D.C., United States
Pages: 38 - 44  
Year of Publication: 1986
ISBN:0-911801-11-1
Author
Osman Balci  Department of Computer Science, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia
Sponsor
SIGSIM: ACM Special Interest Group on Simulation and Modeling
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 13,   Downloads (12 Months): 45,   Citation Count: 12
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/318242.318258
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this paper is to provide some guidelines for assessing the credibility of simulation results. The life cycle of a simulation study is characterized in terms of 10 phases, 10 processes, and 13 credibility assessment stages (CASs). The credibility of simulation results is assessed by integrating ten CASs: formulated problem verification, feasibility assessment, system and objectives definition verification, model qualification, communicative model verification, programmed model verification, experiment design verification, data validation, model validation, and quality assurance of experimental model. Indicators are identified for evaluating credibility in most of the CASs. The guidelines provided herein are essential for the success of a simulation study.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Annino, J.S. and Russell, E.C. (1979). The ten most frequent causes of simulation analysis failure- and how to avoid them!. Simulation 32, 6 (June), 137-140.
 
2
 
3
Balci, O. (1986b). Guidelines for successful simulation studies. Technical Report TR-85-2, Department of Computer Science, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Va., May
 
4
B~lci, O. ~rtd Nance, R.E. (1985). Formulated problem verification as an explicit requirement of model credibility. Simulation 45, 2 (Aug.), 76-86.
5
 
6
Balci, O. and Sargent, R.G. (1984). A bibliography on the credibility assessment and validation of simulation and mathematical models. SimuIetter 15, 3 (July), 15-27.
 
7
 
8
Elmaghraby, S.E. (1968). The role of modeling ia IE design. Industrial Engineering lt?, 6 (June), 292-305.
 
9
Law, A.M. (1983). Feature article: statistical analysis of simulation output d~ta. Operations Research 31, 6 (Nov.-Dec.), 983-1029.
 
10
Monahan, J.F. (1977). The accuracy of stochastic algorithms. Tech. Rep. 23502, Brookhuven N~tional L~boratory, Upton, N.Y.
 
11
Nance, R.E. (1981). Model representation in discrete event simulation: the conical methodology. Technical Report CS81003-R, Department of Computer Science, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Va., Mar.
 
12
 
13
Nance, R.E. and Balci, O. (1986). The objectives and requirements of model management, in Systems and Control Encyclopedia: Theory, Technology, and Applications. (M. Singh, Ed.) Pergamon Press, Oxford. In press.
 
14
 
15
 
16
Schlesinger, S., et al. (1979). Terminology for model credibility. Simulation 32, 3 (Mar.), 103-t04.
 
17
 
18
Wilson, J.R. and Pritsker, A.A.B. (1978). A survey of research on the simulation startup problem. Simulation 81, 2 (Aug.), 55-58.
 
19
 
20

CITED BY  12