ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Participatory teaching methods in computer science
Full text PdfPdf (677 KB)
Source Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education archive
Proceedings of the eighteenth SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education table of contents
St. Louis, Missouri, United States
Pages: 155 - 160  
Year of Publication: 1987
ISBN:0-89791-217-9
Also published in ...
Author
James S. Jones  Computer Science Department, Graceland College, Lamoni, IA
Sponsor
SIGCSE: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Science Education
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 38,   Citation Count: 6
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/31820.31751
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper discusses the role of participatory teaching methods in the computer science classroom. The list of these methods includes brainstorming, directed dialogues, small discussion groups, role playing, games, debates, panel discussions, and Socratic dialogues. The author has used such methods in Computers and Society classes and to a limited degree in Compiler Design, Computer Architecture and Operating Systems classes and believes that such techniques have a place in the computer science classroom. It is the aim of this paper to provide an overview of participatory teaching methods and their use in computer science education.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
M. Adler (Ed.), "The Conduct of Seminars" (Ch. i), The Paideia Proqram: Pointers and Prospects, Macmillan Publishing Co., 1984
 
2
L. Allen, P. Kugel and J. Ross, "QUERIES 'N THEORIES: The Science & Language Game", WFF 'N PROOF Publishers, iiii Maple Ave., Turtle Creek, PA 15145, Copyright 1970
 
3
E.P. Bell, Jr., "Debating Controversial Issues", The History Teacher, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 207-223 (Feb. 1982)
 
4
M. Buchmann, "Improving Education by Talking: Argument or Conversation?", Teachers Colleqe Record, Vol. 86, pp. 441- 453 (Spring 1985)
 
5
S. Carroll, et al, "The Relative Effectiveness of Training Methods-- Expert Opinion and Research", Personnel PsYchology, Vol. 25, pp. 495-509, 1972
 
6
J. Dewey, Experience and Education, Collier Books (a division of Macmillan Publishing Co.), 1938
 
7
D. Gailagher, et al, Using TAKING SIDES in the Classroom, (a general instructor's manual for the entire Taking Sides series), The Dushkin Publishing Group, Inc., Sluice Dock, Guilford, CT 06437 (phone 800/243-6532), 1986
 
8
P. Hounshell and G. Madrazo, Jr., "Debate: Verbal Encounters In the Science Classroom", School Science and Mathematics, Vol. 79, pp. 690-694 (Dec 79)
 
9
J. Newstrom, "Evaluating the Effectiveness of Training Methods", Personnel Administrator, January 1980, pp. 55-60
 
10
H Schroeder and D. G. Ebert, Business and Society Teaching Technique", Journal of Business Education, Vol. 58, pp. 266-269 (April 1983)
 
11
G. Stanford and A. E. Roark, Human Interaction in Education, Allyn and Bacon, Inc. 1974
 
12
"The Constitution: That Delicate Balance" and "The Military and the Media", each is a 13-part PBS series produced by The Media and Society Seminars, Columbia University School of Journalism
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
E. J. Lias, Future Mind, Little, Brown and Company, 1982
 
17
K. Schellenberg (Ed.), Computers in Society, (an Annual Editions publication), The Dushkin Publishing Group, 1986
 
18