| Simulation in a CIM environment: structure for analysis and real-time control |
| Full text |
Pdf
(724 KB)
|
| Source
|
Winter Simulation Conference
archive
Proceedings of the 20th conference on Winter simulation
table of contents
San Diego, California, United States
Pages: 704 - 711
Year of Publication: 1988
ISBN:0-911801-42-1
|
|
Authors
|
|
Catherine M. Harmonosky
|
Department of Industrial and Management Systems Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA
|
|
Dean C. Barrick
|
JLG Industries, Inc., JLG Drive, McConnellsburg, PA
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4, Downloads (12 Months): 11, Citation Count: 4
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
Simulation has long been recognized as a valuable tool for analyzing manufacturing systems. It is effective for assessing the impact of changing system parameters (e.g. reducing processing time) upon system performance measures, and it can also aid decisions concerning system configuration. At Penn State, simulation is playing an important role in the development of a Computer Integrated Manufacturing Laboratory. Currently, it is being used as an analysis tool studying system design and computer communication issues. Future plans are to use simulation as a real-time scheduling and control tool. Due to this ultimate long-term goal of the simulation model use, the model structure is different than traditional manufacturing applications of simulation. Rather than having events associated with workpiece movement and processing drive the simulation, computer communication events drive the model. This paper first discusses the general considerations involved when applying simulation as an analysis tool and potential real-time control tool in the CIM environment. The paper then discusses these analysis and real-time control issues in detail using the Penn State CIM Lab application as an illustrative example.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
David D. Bedworth , James E. Bailey, Integrated Production, Control Systems: Management, Analysis, and Design, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, 1982
|
| |
2
|
Ben-Arieh, D. (1985). "A Knowledge Based System for Simulation and Control of a CIM," Proceedings of the First International Conference on Simulation in Manufacturing, Stratford-upon-Avon, UD, March.
|
 |
3
|
Cynthia Erikson , Antonie Vandenberge , Trevor Miles, Simulation, animation, and shop-floor control, Proceedings of the 19th conference on Winter simulation, p.649-653, December 14-16, 1987, Atlanta, Georgia, United States
[doi> 10.1145/318371.318678]
|
| |
4
|
Harmonosky, C.M. (1986). "Integrating Automated Systems Control and Design," CIM Review, Vol. 2, No. 3, Spring.
|
| |
5
|
Mills, R. I. and Talavage, J.J. (1985). "Simulation Programs for FMS Design," ~roceedings of the F_~ International Conference o__nn Simulation i__nn Manufacturing, Stratford-upon-Avon, UD, March.
|
| |
6
|
Sadowski, R.P. (1985). "Improving Automated Systems Scheduling," CIM Review, Vol. 2, No. i, Fail.
|
| |
7
|
Wu, S.D. (1987). "An Expert System Approach for the Control and Scheduling of Flexible Manufacturing Cells," Unpublished PhD Thesis, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
|
CITED BY 4
|
|
Catherine M. Harmonosky, Implementation issues using simulation for real-time scheduling, control, and monitoring, Proceedings of the 22nd conference on Winter simulation, p.595-598, December 09-12, 1990, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
|
|
|
Gleen R. Drake , Jeffrey S. Smith , Brett A. Peters, Simulation as a planning and scheduling tool for flexible manufacturing systems, Proceedings of the 27th conference on Winter simulation, p.805-812, December 03-06, 1995, Arlington, Virginia, United States
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|