ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Optimization over a finite number of system designs with one-stage sampling and multiple comparisons with the best
Full text PdfPdf (631 KB)
Source Winter Simulation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 20th conference on Winter simulation table of contents
San Diego, California, United States
Pages: 451 - 457  
Year of Publication: 1988
ISBN:0-911801-42-1
Authors
Jason C. Hsu  Department of Statistics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
Barry L. Nelson  Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
Sponsors
ORS : Orthopaedic Research Society
SIGSIM: ACM Special Interest Group on Simulation and Modeling
TIMS :
IEEE-CS : Computer Society
IEEE-SMCS : Systems, Man & Cybernetics Society
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 7,   Downloads (12 Months): 17,   Citation Count: 9
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/318123.318232
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Multiple comparisons with the best, which is applicable to single-stage experiments, is introduced as a method for choosing the best of a finite number of system designs. Examples are given.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Aubuchon, J.A., Gupte~, S.S. and Hsu, J.C. (1986). PROC RSMCB: Ranking, Selection, and Multiple Comparisons with the Best. Chapter 38, SUGI Supplemental Library User's Guide, Version 5 Edition (1986). $AS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
 
2
Bechhofer, R. E. (1954). A single-sample multiple decision procedure for ranking means of normal populations with known variances. Annal~ of Mathematical Statistics 25~ 16-39.
3
 
4
Gupta, S. S. (1956). On a decision rule for a problem in ranking means. Inst. of Statist. Mimeo. Set. No. I50, Univ. of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
 
5
Gupta, S. S. (1965). On some multiple decision (selection and ranking) rules. Teehnometrics 7, 225-245.
 
6
Hsu, J. C. (1981). Simultaneous confidence intervals for all distances from the 'best'. Annals of Statistics 9, 1026-1034.
 
7
Hsu, J. C. (1984a). Ranking and Selection and Multiple Compaxisons with the Best. In: Chapter 3~ Design of Experiment~: Ranking and Selection (Thomas j. Santner and Ajit C. Tamhane, eds.). Marcel Dekker, New York.
 
8
Hsu, J. C. (1984b). Constrained two-sided simultaneous confidence intervals for multiple comparisons with the best. Annah of Statistics 12, 1136-1144.
 
9
Iglehaxt, D.L. (1977). Simulating stable stochastic systems, VII: Selecting the best system. In: TIMS Studies in the Management Science8 7, 37-49.
 
10
Koenig, L.W. and Law, A.M. (1985). A procedure for selecting a subset of size rn containing the l best of k independent populations, with applications to simulation. Communications in ~~tatistic~ * Simulation and Computation 14, 719-734.

CITED BY  9

Collaborative Colleagues:
Jason C. Hsu: colleagues
Barry L. Nelson: colleagues