The methodology roles in the realization of a model development environment

ABSTRACT

The definition of “methodology” is followed by a very brief review of past work in modeling methodologies. The dual role of a methodology is explained: (1) conceptual guidance in the modeling task, and (2) definition of needs for environment designers. A model development environment based on the conical methodology serves for specific illustration of both roles.

REFERENCES

• 1: Alford, M. (1985). SREM at the age of eight: the distributed computing design system. IEEE Computer 18, 36-54.
• 2: James D. Arthur , Richard E. Nance , Sallie M. Henry, A Procedural Approach to Evaluating Software Development Methodologies: The Foundation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University, Blacksburg, VA, 1986
• 3: James D. Arthur , Richard E. Nance, Developing an Automated Procedure for Evaluating Software Development Methodologies and Associated Products, Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University, Blacksburg, VA, 1987
• 4: Osman Balci, Requirements for model development environments, Computers and Operations Research, v.13 n.1, p.53-67, Jan. 1986 [doi>10.1016/0305-0548(86)90064-X]
• 5: Balci, O. and Nance, R.E. (1987). Simulation model development environments: a research prototype, Journal of the Operational Research Society 38, 753-763.
• 6: David W. Balmer, Modelling styles and their support in the CASM environment, Proceedings of the 19th conference on Winter simulation, p.478-485, December 14-16, 1987, Atlanta, Georgia, United States [doi>10.1145/318371.318641]
• 7: Balzer, R., Cheatham, T.E. rind Green, C. (1983). Software technology in the 1990's using a new paradigm, IEEE Computer 16, 39-45.
• 8: Robert Balzer, A 15 year perspective on automatic programming, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, v.11 n.11, p.1257-1268, Nov. 1985 [doi>10.1109/TSE.1985.231877]
• 9: Basili, V.R. and Weiss, D.M. (1985). A methodology for collecting valid software engineering data. 1EEE Transactions on Software Engineering 11, 157-168.
• 10: Bergland, G.D. (1981). A guided tour of program design methodologies. IEEE Computer 14, 13-36.
• 11: Bronowski, J. (1973). The Ascent of Man, British Broadcasting Corporation.
• 12: D. N. Card , F. E. McGarry , G. T. Page, Evaluating software engineering technologies, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, v.13 n.7, p.845-851, July 1987 [doi>10.1109/TSE.1987.233495]
• 13: Peter Pin-Shan Chen, The entity-relationship model—toward a unified view of data, ACM Transactions on Database Systems (TODS), v.1 n.1, p.9-36, March 1976 [doi>10.1145/320434.320440]
• 14: Colter, M.A. (1982). Evolution of the structured methodologies. In: Advanced System Development/Feasibility Techniques (J.D. Couger, M.A. Colter, and R.W. Knapp, eds.) John Wiley, 74-95.
• 15: Gelovani, V.A. (1984). An interactive modeling system as a tool for analyzing complen socio-ec~nomic problems. In: Models of Reality: Shaping Thought and Action, Lomond Books.
• 16: Arthur M. Geoffrion, An introduction to structured modeling, Management Science, v.33 n.5, p.547-588, May 1987 [doi>10.1287/mnsc.33.5.547]
• 17: Geoffrion, A.M. (1988). SML: a model definition language for structured modeling. Working Paper No. 360, Western Management Science Institute, University of California, Los Angeles.
• 18: Greenberg, H.J. and Maybee, J.S. ( 1981 ). Computer-Assisted Analysis and Model Simplification. Academic Press, New York.
• 19: Harvey Greenberg, A Functional Description of ANALYZE: A Computer-Assisted Analysis System for Linear Programming Models, ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software (TOMS), v.9 n.1, p.18-56, March 1983 [doi>10.1145/356022.356024]
• 20: Heninger, K.L., Kallender, J.W., Shore, J.E., and Parnus, D.L. (1978). Software requirements for the A-7E aircraft. NRL Memorandum Report 3876, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, D.C.
• 21: James D. Arthur , Richard E. Nance , Sallie M. Henry, A Procedural Approach to Evaluating Software Development Methodologies: The Foundation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University, Blacksburg, VA, 1986
• 22: Kiviat, P.J. (1967). Digital computer simulation: modeling concepts, RAND Memorandum RM-5378-PR, Santa Monica, California.
• 23: Kiviat, P.J. (1969). Digital computer simulation: computer programming languages, RAND Report RM-5883-PR, Santa Monica, California.
• 24: William G. Kurator , Richard P. O'Neill, PERUSE: An Interactive System for Mathematical Programs, ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software (TOMS), v.6 n.4, p.489-509, Dec. 1980 [doi>10.1145/355921.355923]
• 25: Lackner, M.R. (1962). Toward a general simulation capability. In: Proceedings of the SJCC, AFIPS Press, 1-14.
• 26: Meeraus, A. (1983). An algebraic approach to modeling. Journal Economic Dynamic Control 5, 81-108.
• 27: Nance, R.E. (1977). The feasibility of and methodology for developing Federal documentation standards for simulation models. Final Report to the National Bureau of Standards, Department of Computer Science, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia.
• 28: Nonce, R.E. (1981). Model representation in discrete event simulation: the conical methodology. Technical Report CS81003-R, Department of Computer Science, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia.
• 29: Richard E. Nanoe, Model development revisited, Proceedings of the 16th conference on Winter simulation, p.74-80, December 28-30, 1984, Dallas, TX
• 30: Nanee, R.E. (1988). The conical methodology: a framework for simulation model development In: Proceedings of the Conference on Methodology and Validation (O. Balci, ed.), Simulation Series 19, Society for Computer Simulation, San Diego, California.
• 31: Oren, T.I. (1982). Computer aided modeling systems. In: Progress in Modeling and Simulation (F.E. Collier, ed.), Academic Press, London.
• 32: Oren, T.I. and Zeigler, B.P. (1979). Concepts for advanced simulation systems. Simulation 32, 69-82.
• 33: C Michael Overstreet , Richard E. Nance, A specification language to assist in analysis of discrete event simulation models, Communications of the ACM, v.28 n.2, p.190-201, Feb. 1985 [doi>10.1145/2786.2792]
• 34: Sawyer, S.K. and Dawson, C.A. (1984). Practical applications of software engineering theorems and methodologies to software system design problems. UCCEL Corporation, Dallas, Texas.
• 35: SotTech, Inc. (1976). An Introduction to SADT: Structured Analysis and Design Technique, Document No. BCS-10167.
• 36: Bernard P. Zeigler, Theory of Modelling and Simulation, Krieger Publishing Co., Inc., Melbourne, FL, 1984

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  I. Computing Methodologies
  I.6 SIMULATION AND MODELING
      I.6.5 Model Development
          Subjects: Modeling methodologies

Additional Classification:
  I. Computing Methodologies
  I.6 SIMULATION AND MODELING
      I.6.7 Simulation Support Systems
          Subjects: Environments

General Terms:
Design, Performance, Theory