ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Using simulation techniques to improve skeletal plans for the control of a vertical internal grinding machine
Full text PdfPdf (756 KB)
Source Annual Simulation Symposium archive
Proceedings of the 22nd annual symposium on Simulation table of contents
Tampa, Florida, United States
Pages: 153 - 160  
Year of Publication: 1989
ISBN:0-8186-1946-5
Authors
Barbara H. Roberts  MITRE, Bedford, MA
David C. Brown  Artificial Intelligence Research Group, Computer Science Department, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA
Sponsor
SIGSIM: ACM Special Interest Group on Simulation and Modeling
Publisher
IEEE Computer Society Press  Los Alamitos, CA, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 0,   Downloads (12 Months): 11,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  

ABSTRACT

This research investigates the use of simulation techniques for the improvement of skeletal plans selected by a planner. These plans are used for control of a vertical internal grinding machine. Plans are selected using a description of the grinding task. These plans reflect the machinist's grinding knowledge. Once selected the plan is instantiated with the proper parameter values. The instantiated plans are passed to the grinding simulation where simulated force sensor readings emulate real-time signals. Feedback from the simulation is used by a knowledge-based system to modify successful plans and to identify failed plans.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
A. Agogino, S. Russell & R. Guha (1988) Sensor Fusion using Influence Diagrams and Reasoning by Analogy: Application to Milling Machine Monitoring and Control. In: Artificial Intelligence in Engineering: Diagnosis and Learning, (Ed.) J. S. Gero, Elsevier/Computational Mechanics Publications, pp. 333-357.
 
2
G. Amitay, S. Malkin & Y. Koren (1981) Adaptive Control and Optimization of Grinding, Jnl. of Eng. for Industry, Trans. ASME, pp. 103-108.
 
3
D. C. Brown & B. Chandrasekaran (1985) Plan selection in design problem solving. AIRG-DCB85-AISB, Computer Science Dept., Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA.
 
4
 
5
R. I. King & R. S. Hahn (1986) Handbook of Modern Grinding Technology, Chapman and Hall, NY.
 
6
R. P. Lindsay (1971) On the Metal Removal and Wheel Removal Parameters Surface Finish, Geometry and Thermal Damage in Precision Grinding, Ph.D. Thesis, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA.
 
7
R. P. Lindsay (1984) The Effect of Contact on Forces, Power and Metal Removal Rate in Precision Grinding. International Gr/nding Conference, Lake Geneva, Wis., Society of Manufacturing Engineers, Dearborn, MI.
 
8
 
9
C. Hayes & P. K. Wright (1986) Automated Planning in the Machining Domain. Proceedings of ASME Meeting on Knowledge Based Expert Systems for Man~lfacturing, PED-Vol. 24, pp. 221- 232.
 
10
S. Malkin (1981)Grinding Cycle Optimization, Annuals of CIRP, Vol. 30.
 
11
S. Malkin & Y. Koren (1980) Off-line Grinding Optimization with a Microcomputer, Annuals of CIRP, Vol. 29, pp. 213-216.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Barbara H. Roberts: colleagues
David C. Brown: colleagues