ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Transparent modules with fully syntatic signatures
Full text PdfPdf (1.61 MB)
Source International Conference on Functional Programming archive
Proceedings of the fourth ACM SIGPLAN international conference on Functional programming table of contents
Paris, France
Pages: 220 - 232  
Year of Publication: 1999
ISBN:1-58113-111-9
Also published in ...
Author
Zhong Shao  Dept. of Computer Science, Yale University, New Haven, CT
Sponsors
INRIA : Institut Natl de Recherche en Info et en Automatique
SIGPLAN: ACM Special Interest Group on Programming Languages
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4,   Downloads (12 Months): 25,   Citation Count: 9
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/317636.317801
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

ML-style modules are valuable in the development and maintenance of large software systems, unfortunately, none of the existing languages support them in a fully satisfactory manner. The Official SML'97 Definition does not allow higher-order functors, so a module that refers to externally defined functors cannot accurately describe its import interface. MacQueen and Tofte [26] extended SML'97 with fully transparent higher-order functors, but their system does not have a type-theoretic semantics thus fails to support fully syntactic signatures. The systems of manifest types [19, 20] and translucent sums [12] support fully syntactic signatures but they may propagate fewer type equalities than fully transparent functors. This paper presents a module calculus that supports both fully transparent higher-order functors and fully syntactic signatures (and thus true separate compilation). We give a simple type-theoretic semantics to our calculus and show how to compile it into an Fω-like λ-calculus extended with existential types.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
2
 
3
M. B/ume. A compilation manager for SML/NJ. as part of SML/NJ User's Guide, 1995.
 
4
L. Cardelli and X. Leroy. Abstract types and the dot notation. In Proc. Programming Concepts and Methods, pages 479~;04. North Holland, 1990.
 
5
 
6
S. Corrieo, B. Ewbank, T. Griffin, J. Meale, and H. Trickey. A tool for developing safe and efficient database transactions. In 15th In. ternational Switching Symposium of the World 7~lecommunications Congress, pages 173-177, April 1995.
 
7
8
9
 
10
L. George. MLRISC: Customizable and reusable code generators. Technical memorandum, Lucent Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, N$, 1997.
 
11
J.Y. Girard. Interpretation Fonctionnelle et Elimination des Coupures clans l'Arithmetique d'Ordre Superieur. PhD thesis, University of Paris VII, 1972.
12
13
14
15
 
16
R. Harper and C. Stone. An interpretation of Standard ML in type theory. Technical Report CMU--CS-97-147, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, June 1997.
17
18
19
20
 
21
X. Leroy. A syntactic ~eory of type generativity and sharing. Journal of Functional Programming, 6(5): 1-32, September 1996.
22
 
23
M. LiUibr/dge. Translucent Sums: A Foundation far Higher-Order Module Systems. PhD thesis, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, May 1997. T~ch Report CMU-CS- 97-122.
24
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
29
 
30
 
31
J.H. Reppy and E. R. Gansner. The eXene library manual. SML/NJ documentations, March 1991.
 
32
 
33
C.V. Russo. Types For Modules. PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK, June 1998.
34
35
 
36
Z. Shoo. Transparent modules with fully syntactic signatures (extended version). Technical Report YALEU/DCS/RR-1181, Dept. of Computer Science, Yale Univ., New Haven, CT, June 1999.
 
37
38
39