Comprehending non-linear text: the role of discourse cues and reading strategies

ABSTRACT

By studying the structure of written discourse and the processes by which readers acquire information from texts, we have learned a great deal about how to design texts that facilitate learning. However, recent advances in computer technology have enabled the development of new forms of text that violate standard assumptions of what texts are like. These new forms may pose serious problems for learning because they lack discourse features that readers rely on for assimilating new information. In particular, readers traditionally rely on the writer to determine the sequence of topics and to employ conventional cues that signal relationships among topics, such as relative importance or chronology. However, on-line hypertext systems present texts non-linearly, requiring readers to decide what information to read and in what order. This paper assesses the potential impact of non-linear texts on theories of discourse and on current cognitive theories of text processing. It also describes research in progress on readers' sequencing strategies in hypertext. Research on the effect of hypertext on reading will have important practical implications for designing hypertext systems that satisfy readers' needs.

REFERENCES

• Adel81: Adelson, B. "Problem solving and the development of abstract categories in programming languages." Memor~ and Cognition, 9, 422-433, 1981.
• Barn84: Barnard, P., MacLean, A., Hammond, N. "User representations of ordered sequences of command operations." Paper delivered at INTERACT '84- the First IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, 1984.
• Char86: Chamey, D., Reder, L. "Designing interactive tutorials for computer users." Human-Comt~uter interaction, 2, 297-317, 1986.
• Conk87: Conklin, J. "A survey of hypertext" (MCC Technical Report STP-356-86, Rev. 1). MCC Software Technology Program, Austin, TX, February, 1987.
• Deli86: Norman Delisle , Mayer Schwartz, Neptune: a hypertext system for CAD applications, ACM SIGMOD Record, v.15 n.2, p.132-143, June 1986
• Fahn83: Fahnestock, J., Secor, M. "Teaching argument" a theory of types." College Composition and Communication, 34, 20-30, 1983.
• Felk81: Felker, D., Pickering, F., Charrow, V., Holland, V., Redish, J. Guidelines for Document Designers. Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research, 1981.
• Fras70: Frase, L."The influence of sentence order and amount of higher level text processing upon reproductive and productive memory." American Educational Research Journal, 307-319, 1970.
• Hala87: Frank G. Halasz , Thomas P. Moran , Randall H. Trigg, Notecards in a nutshell, Proceedings of the SIGCHI/GI conference on Human factors in computing systems and graphics interface, p.45-52, April 05-09, 1987, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
• Hall76: Halliday, M., & Hasan, R. Cohesion i.n English. London" Longman, 1976.
• Kier80: Kieras, D. "Abstracting main ideas from technical prose" (Technical Report 5). University of Arizona, Tucson, 1980.
• Kier85: Kieras, D., Dechert, C. "Rules for comprehensible technical prose- a survey of the psycholinguistic literature" (Technical Report 21). University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 1985.
• Kint78: Kintsch, W., van Dijk, T. "Toward a model of text comprehension and production." Psychological R eyiew, 85, 363-394, 1978.
• Maye76: Mayer, R. "Some conditions of meaningful learning for computer programming" advance organizers and subject control of frame order." Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 143-150, 1976.
• Rede86: Reder, L., Charney, D., Morgan, K. "The role of elaborations in learning a skill from an instructional text." M e~m_ory & Cogniti.on, 14, 64-78, 1986.
• Robe79: Robertson, G., McCracken, D., Newell, A. "The ZOG approach to man-machine communication" (Computer Science Technical Report CMU-CS-79-148). Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, Oct., 1979.
• Trig83: Trigg, R. "A network-based approach to text handling for the online scientific community" (Computer Science Technical Report TR-1346). University of Maryland, November, 1983.
• Vand79: van Dijk, T. "Relevance assignment in discourse comprehension." Discourse Processes, 2, 113-126, 1979.
• Vand83: van Dijk, T., Kintsch, W. Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press, 1983.
• Whit85: John Whiteside , Sandra Jones , Paula S. Levy , Dennis Wixon, User performance with command, menu, and iconic interfaces, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.185-191, April 1985, San Francisco, California, United States
• Yank85: Nicole Yankelovich , Norman Meyrowitz , Andries van Dam, Reading and writing the electronic book, Computer, v.18 n.10, p.15-30, Oct. 1985 [doi>10.1109/MC.1985.1662710]

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)

Additional Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.1 MODELS AND PRINCIPLES

  I. Computing Methodologies
  I.7 DOCUMENT AND TEXT PROCESSING
      I.7.2 Document Preparation
          Subjects: Hypertext/hypermedia

General Terms:
Design, Documentation, Human Factors, Languages, Management, Performance, Theory