ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Designing for usability: key principles and what designers think
Full text PdfPdf (1.56 MB)
Source
Communications of the ACM archive
Volume 28 ,  Issue 3  (March 1985) table of contents
Pages: 300 - 311  
Year of Publication: 1985
ISSN:0001-0782
Authors
John D. Gould  IBM Thomas J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY
Clayton Lewis  ECOT 7-7 Engineering Center, Boulder, CO
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 91,   Downloads (12 Months): 919,   Citation Count: 118
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   review   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/3166.3170
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This article is both theoretical and empirical. Theoretically, it describes three principles of system design which we believe must be followed to produce a useful and easy to use computer system. These principles are: early and continual focus on users; empirical measurement of usage; and iterative design whereby the system (simulated, prototype, and real) is modified, tested, modified again, tested again, and the cycle is repeated again and again. This approach is contrasted to other principled design approaches, for example, get it right the first time, reliance on design guidelines. Empirically, the article presents data which show that our design principles are not always intuitive to designers; identifies the arguments which designers often offer for not using these principles—and answers them; and provides an example in which our principles have been used successfully.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Baker, F.T., and Mills, H.D. Chief programmer teams. Dafamation, (Dec. 1973). 58-61.
2
 
3
Boyle, J.M., Bury, K.F.. and Evey. R.J. Two studies evaluating learning and use of QBE and SQL. Tech. Rep. HFC-39. IBM GPD Human Factors Center, San Jose, Calif., 1981.
 
4
 
5
Bury, K.F., and Boyle. J.M. An on-line experimental comparison of two simulated record selection languages. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society Annual Meeting, (Seattle, Wash.), R.E. Edwards, (Ed.), 74-78, 1982. (Available from the Human Factors Society, Box 1369, Santa Monica, Calif. 90406).
 
6
Crosby, P.B. Quality is Free. New American Library, New York, 1979.
 
7
Dijkstra, E.W. Structured Programming: Software Engineering Techrliques, NATO Scientific Affairs Division, Brussels 39, Belgium, Apr. 1970,84-88.
 
8
Dijkstra, E.W., and Hoare. D. Structured Programming. Academic Press, N.Y., 1973.
 
9
Engel. S., and Granda. R. Guidelines for man/display interfaces, Tech. Rep. TR00.2720. IBM, Poughkeepsie Lab.. N.Y.. 1975.
 
10
Ericsson, K.A.. and Simon, H.A. Verbal reports as data. Psychol. Rev. 87,(1980), 215-251.
 
11
Gomory. R.E. Technology development. Science 220, (1983). 576-580.
 
12
Gould, J.D. An experimental study of writing, dictating, and speaking. In Affenfion and Performance VII. J. Requin, (Ed.), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J., 1978. 299-319.
 
13
Gould, J.D. How experts dictate. 1. Exp. Psychol.: Hum. Percept. Perform. 4, 4 (1978). 648-661.
 
14
Gould, J. D. Experiments on composing letters: Some facts, some myths, and some observations. In Cognitive Processes in Writing. L. Gregg. and I. Steinberg, (Eds.) Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J., 1980. pp. 98-127.
 
15
Gould. J.D. Composing letters with computer-based text editors. Hum. Fact. 23, (1981). 593-606.
 
16
Gould, J.D. Writing and speaking letters and messages. Inf. J Man Mach. Stud. 16, (1982), 147-171.
 
17
Gould, J.D.. and Boies, S.J. How authors think about their writing, dictating, and speaking. Hum. Facf. 20, (1978). 495-505.
 
18
Gould, J.D., and Boies. S.J. Writing, dictating, and speaking letters. Science 202. (1976j. 1145-1147.
19
 
20
Gould, J.D., and Boies. S.J. Speech filing-An office system for principals. IBM Sysr. J. 23, (1984), 65-81.
21
22
 
23
Kelley. J.F. Natural language and computers: Six empirical steps for writing an easy-to-use computer application. Ph.D. dissertation, Johns Hopkins University, 1983. (Available from University Microfilm International: 300 North Zeeb Rd. Ann Arbor, Mich. 48106).
 
24
Lewis, C.H. Using the "thinking aloud" method in cognitive interface design. IBM Res. Rep. RC-9265. Yorktown Heights, N.Y., 1982.
25
 
26
Morgan. C., Williams, G.. and Lemmons, P. An interview with Wayne Rosing, Bruce Daniels, and Larry Tesler. Byte, 1983, 90-113.
 
27
 
28
Nix. 0. Two experiments on the comprehensibility of pausedepleted speech. IBM Res. Rep. K-6305. Yorktown Heights, N.Y., 1976.
 
29
Proceedings of the Human Factors in Computing Systems Meetings. (Washington, Mar. 1981; Boston, Dec.. 1983) (Available from ACM, Box 64145, Baltimore, Md. 21264).
 
30
Proceedings of the Human Facfors Society Meeting, (Seattle, Wash, Oct. 1982: Norfolk, Va.. Oct., 1983) (Available from the Human Factors Society, Box 1369, Santa Monica, Calif. 90406).
 
31
Science. New Project Explores Disability Research, 233, (1984). 157.
 
32
Thomas, J.C. Office communications studies: I. Effects of communication behavior on the perception of described persons. IBM Res. Rep. RC-7572. Yorktown Heights, N.Y., 1979.
 
33
Thomas, J.C.. and Gould, J.D. A psychological study of query-byexample. In Proceedings of 1975 National Computer Conference. (1975), 439-445.
 
34
Williams, G. The Lisa computer system. Byte (1983), 33-50.
 
35
Yourdon. E.. and Constantine, L.L. Structured Design. Yourdon, New York, 1976.
 
36
Zloof, M.M. Query by example-A data base language. IBM Sysf. J. 4. (1977), 324-343.

CITED BY  118


REVIEW

"F. Terry Baker : Reviewer"

This article covers three design principles which the authors believe are both important and frequently neglected: (1) Early focus on users and tasks, (2) Empirical measurement, and (3) Iterative design. Gould and Lewis spend more than half of t  more...

Collaborative Colleagues:
John D. Gould: colleagues
Clayton Lewis: colleagues