|
 ABSTRACT
A group of 269 first-semester freshmen was used to predict both performance in an introductory computer science course and first-semester college grade point average by using information regarding the students' programs and performance in high school along with American College Testing Program (ACT) test scores.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
Alspaugh. CA. Identification of some components of computer programming aptitude. J. Res. Math. Educ. 3. 2 (Mar. 1972},89-98.
|
| |
2
|
American College Testing Program. Assessing students on the way to college. Tech. Rep. for the ACT Assessment Program, American College Testing Program, Iowa City, lowa. 1973.
|
 |
3
|
|
| |
4
|
Draper, N.. and Smith, H. Applied Regression Analysis. 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons. New York, 1981.
|
| |
5
|
Fowler. G.C., and Glorfeld. L.W. Predicting aptitude in introductory computing: A classification model. AEDS I. 14. 2 (Winter Z981), 96- 109.
|
| |
6
|
Konvalina, J.. Stephens, L.. and Wileman, S. Identifying factors influencing computer science aptitude and achievement. AEDS I. 16, 2 (Winter 1963). 106-112.
|
| |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
Peterson, CC., and Howe, T.G. Predicting academic success in introduction to computers. AEDS J. 12, 4 (Summer 19791, 162-191.
|
| |
9
|
|
| |
10
|
SAS Institute. SAS User's Guide: Stafistics. 1982 ed. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.. 1982. -.- I.
|
| |
11
|
Stevens, LJ.J. Cogmttve processes and success 01 students in mstructional computer courses. AEDS I. 16,4 (Summer 1983), 228-233.
|
| |
12
|
Stephens, L.J., Wileman, S.. and Konvalina. J. Group differences in computer science aptitude. AEDS I. 14, 2 (Winter 1981), 84-95.
|
| |
13
|
Walpole, R.E., and Myers, R.H. Probability and Statistics for Engineers and Sciertfists. 2nd ad. MacMillan Publishing Co.. New York, 1978.
|
CITED BY 28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Andre P. Calitz , Mark B. Watson , Gideon de V de Kock, Identification and selection of successful future IT personnel in a changing technological and business environment, Proceedings of the 1997 ACM SIGCPR conference on Computer personnel research, p.31-35, April 03-05, 1997, San Francisco, California, United States
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peter B. Henderson , Doug Baldwin , Venu Dasigi , Marcel Dupras , Jane Fritz , David Ginat , Don Goelman , John Hamer , Lew Hitchner , Will Lloyd , Bill Marion, Jr. , Charles Riedesel , Henry Walker, Striving for mathematical thinking, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, v.33 n.4, December 2001
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ashraful A. Chowdhury , C. Van Nelson , Clinton P. Fuelling , Roy L. McCormick, Predicting success of a beginning computer course using logistic regression (abstract only), Proceedings of the 15th annual conference on Computer Science, p.449, February 1987, St. Louis, Missouri, United States
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peter B. Henderson , Doug Baldwin , Venu Dasigi , Marcel Dupras , Jane Fritz , David Ginat , Don Goelman , John Hamer , Lew Hitchner , Will Lloyd , Bill Marion, Jr. , Charles Riedesel , Henry Walker, Striving for mathematical thinking, Working group reports from ITiCSE on Innovation and technology in computer science education, December 01, 2001, Canterbury, UK
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sandra Katz , David Allbritton , John Aronis , Christine Wilson , Mary Lou Soffa, Gender, achievement, and persistence in an undergraduate computer science program, ACM SIGMIS Database, v.37 n.4, Fall 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adobe Acrobat
QuickTime
Windows Media Player
Real Player
Pdf
K.3