ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Simulation and sensitivity of linear analog circuits under parameter variations by Robust interval analysis
Full text PdfPdf (325 KB)
Source ACM Transactions on Design Automation of Electronic Systems (TODAES) archive
Volume 4 ,  Issue 3  (July 1999) table of contents
Pages: 280 - 312  
Year of Publication: 1999
ISSN:1084-4309
Authors
C.-J. Richard Shi  University of Washington
Michael W. Tian  University of Iowa
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 1,   Downloads (12 Months): 46,   Citation Count: 3
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/315773.315780
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

An interval-mathematic approach is presented for frequency-domain simulation and sensitivity analysis of linear analog circuits under parameter variations. With uncertain parameters represented as intervals, bounding frequency-domain responses is formulated as the problem of solving systems of linear interval equations. The formulation is based on a variant of modified nodal analysis, and is particularly amenable to interval analysis. Some characterization of the solution sets of systems of linear interval equations are derived. With these characterizations, an elegant and efficient algorithm is proposed to solve systems of linear interval equations. While the widely used Monte Carlo approach requires many circuit simulations to achieve even moderate accuracy, the computational cost of the proposed approach is about twice that of one circuit simulation. The computed response bounds contain provably, or are usually very close to, the actual response bounds. Further, sensitivity under parameter variations can be computed from the response bounds at minor computational cost. The algorithms are implemented in SPICE3F5, using sparse-matrix techniques and tested on several practical analog circuits.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
BAKER, K., RICHARDSON, A. M., AND DOREY, A. P. 1996. Mixed signal test: techniques, applications and demands. IEE Proc. Circuits Devices Syst. 143, 6 (Dec.), 358-365.
 
2
BRAYTON, R. K., HOFFMAN, A. J., AND SCOTT, T. R. 1977. A theorem on inverse of convex sets of real matrices with application to the worst case DC problem. IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. 24, 8 (Aug.), 409-415.
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
HARKNESS, C. L. AND LOPRESTI, D. P. 1992. Interval methods for modeling uncertainty. IEEE Trans. Comput.-Aided Des. 11, 11 (Nov.), 1388-1401.
 
7
HOUSEHOLDER, A. S. 1957. A survey of some closed methods for inverting matrices. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 5, 155-169.
 
8
Ho, C. W., RUEHLI, A. E., AND BRENNAN, P.A. 1975. The modified nodal approach to network analysis. IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. 22 (June), 504-509.
 
9
HUANG, L. P. AND BRYANT, R. E. 1993. Intractability in linear switch-level simulation. IEEE Trans. Comput.-Aided Des. 12, 7 (July), 829-836.
 
10
KUNDERT, K. S. 1986. Sparse matrix techniques. In Circuit Analysis, Simulation, and Design: General Aspects of Circuit Analysis and Design, A. E. Ruehli, Ed. North-Holland Publishing Co. advances in CAD for VLSI. North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
 
11
KOLEV, L. V., MLADENOV, V. M., AND VLADOV, S. S. 1988. Interval mathematics algorithms for tolerance analysis. IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. 35, 8 (Aug.), 967-974.
 
12
 
13
NAGEL, L.W. 1975. SPICE2: A computer program to simulate semiconductor circuits. Ph.D. Dissertation. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Univ. of Carlifornia at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA.
 
14
NEUMAIER, A. 1990. Interval Methods for Systems of Equations. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.
 
15
PAHWA, A. AND ROHRER, R.A. 1982. Band-faults: Efficient approximations to fault bands for the simulation before fault diagnosis of linear circuits. IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. 29, 2 (Feb.), 81-88.
 
16
DARPA, 1996. Proceedings of the on Electronic Interconnect and Packaging Program Review. U.S. Defense Advanced Research Project Agency, Washington, D.C..
 
17
SHI, C.-J. AND TIAN, W. 1997. Non-Monte Carlo simulation and sensitivity of linear(ized) analog circuits under parameter variations. In Proceedings of the IFIP International Conference on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI '97, Gramado, Brazil, Aug. 26-29).
 
18
SKELBOE, S. 1979. True worst-case analysis of linear electrical circuits by interval arithmetic. IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. 26 (Oct.), 874-879.
 
19
SPENCE, R. AND SOIN, R. S. 1988. Tolerance Design of Electronic Circuits. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
 
20
TIAN, W., LING, X., AND LIU, R. 1996. Novel methods for circuit worst-case tolerance analysis. IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. 43 (Part 1), 4 (Apr.), 272-278.
21
 
22
TIAN, M. W. AND SHI, C.-J. 1998. Worst-case analysis of linear analog circuits using sensitivity bands. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS). IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA, 110-113.
 
23
 
24


Collaborative Colleagues:
C.-J. Richard Shi: colleagues
Michael W. Tian: colleagues