An experimental comparison of RGB, YIQ, LAB, HSV, and opponent color models

ABSTRACT

The increasing availability of affordable color raster graphics displays has made it important to develop a better understanding of how color can be used effectively in an interactive environment. Most contemporary graphics displays offer a choice of some 16 million colors; the user's problem is to find the right color. Folklore has it that the RGB color space arising naturally from color display hardware is user-hostile and that other color models such as the HSV scheme are preferable. Until now there has been virtually no experimental evidence addressing this point. We describe a color matching experiment in which subjects used one of two tablet-based input techniques, interfaced through one of five color models, to interactively match target colors displayed on a CRT. The data collected show small but significant differences between models in the ability of subjects to match the five target colors used in this experiment. Subjects using the RGB color model matched quickly but inaccurately compared with those using the other models. The largest speed difference occurred during the early convergence phase of matching. Users of the HSV color model were the slowest in this experiment, both during the convergence phase and in total time to match, but were relatively accurate. There was less variation in performance during the second refinement phase of a match than during the convergence phase. Two-dimensional use of the tablet resulted in faster but less accurate performance than did strictly one-dimensional usage. Significant learning occurred for users of the Opponent, YIQ, LAB, and HSV color models, and not for users of the RGB color model.

REFERENCES

• 1: Labs Bell , John M. Chambers , Peter J. Bickel , William S. Cleveland , Richard M. Dudley, S an Interactive Environment for Data Analysis and Graphics, CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL, 1984
• 2: Toby Berk , Arie Kaufman , Lee Brownston, A human factors study of color notation systems for computer graphics, Communications of the ACM, v.25 n.8, p.547-550, Aug 1982 [doi>10.1145/358589.358606]
• 3: BERK, T., BROWNSTON, L., AND KAUFMAN, A. A new color-naming system for graphics languages. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 2, 3 (May 1982), 37-44.
• 4: BOYNTON, R.M. Human Color Vision. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, 1979.
• 5: CIE. Recommendations on Uniform Color Spaces, Color-Difference Equations, Psychrometric Color Terms. Bureau Central de la CIE (Supplement 2 of CIE Publication 15 (E-1.3.1) 1971), 1978.
• 6: William B. Cowan, An inexpensive scheme for calibration of a colour monitor in terms of CIE standard coordinates, ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, v.17 n.3, p.315-321, July 1983
• 7: Kenneth B. Evans , Peter P. Tanner , Marceli Wein, Tablet-based valuators that provide one, two, or three degrees of freedom, ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, v.15 n.3, p.91-97, August 1981
• 8: James D. Foley , Andries Van Dam, Fundamentals of interactive computer graphics, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, 1982
• 9: HUNT, R. W.G. The Reproduction o{ Colour. Fountain Press, 1975.
• 10: HURVlCH, L.M. Color Vision. Sinaur, Sunderland, Mass., 1981.
• 11: George H. Joblove , Donald Greenberg, Color spaces for computer graphics, ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, v.12 n.3, p.20-25, August 1978
• 12: MUNSELL, A.H. A Color Notation. Munsell Color Company, 1939.
• 13: OSTLE, B., AND MENSING, R.W. Statistics in Research. The Iowa State University Press, 1975.
• 14: SCHWARZ, M.W. An empirical evaluation of interactive colour selection techniques. M. Math. dissertation, Dept. of Computer Science, Univ. of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ont., Canada, 1985.
• 15: Alvy Ray Smith, Color gamut transform pairs, ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, v.12 n.3, p.12-19, August 1978
• 16: WALPOLE, R. E., AND MYERS, R. H. Probability and Statistics {or Engineers and Scientists. McMillan, New York, 1978.
• 17: WARE, C., AND BEATTY, J.C. Using colour as a tool in discrete data analysis. Rep. CS-85-21, Dept. of Computer Science, Univ. of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ont., Canada.
• 18: WYSZECKI, G., AND STILES, W.S. Color Science: Concepts and Methods, Quantitative Data and Formulae, 2nd ed. Wiley, New York, 1982.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  I. Computing Methodologies
  I.3 COMPUTER GRAPHICS
      I.3.6 Methodology and Techniques
          Subjects: Ergonomics

Additional Classification:
  I. Computing Methodologies
  I.3 COMPUTER GRAPHICS
      I.3.1 Hardware architecture
          Subjects: Raster display devices
      I.3.6 Methodology and Techniques
          Subjects: Interaction techniques

General Terms:
Experimentation, Human Factors