ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Quasi-asynchronous migration: a novel migration protocol for PVM tasks
Full text PdfPdf (757 KB)
Source ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review archive
Volume 33 ,  Issue 2  (April 1999) table of contents
Pages: 5 - 14  
Year of Publication: 1999
ISSN:0163-5980
Authors
Pei Dan  Department of Computer Science, Tsinghua University, Beifing 100084, P.R. China
Wang Dongsheng  Department of Computer Science, Tsinghua University, Beifing 100084, P.R. China
Zhang Youhui  Department of Computer Science, Tsinghua University, Beifing 100084, P.R. China
Shen Meiming  Department of Computer Science, Tsinghua University, Beifing 100084, P.R. China
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 3,   Downloads (12 Months): 10,   Citation Count: 4
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/311094.311100
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Process migration is a desirable and useful facility for the Network of Workstations (NOW). This paper presents a novel migration protocol called quasi-asynchronous migration for PVM tasks, which allows non-migrating tasks to execute during most of the time of migration. Message flushing and message delaying are the key mechanisms used in quasi-asynchronous migration. Because the protocol is implemented on top of PVM and at user-level, it is both transparent to users and portable. Both the analysis of the migration protocol and the experimental results show that quasi-asynchronous migration has lower overhead than other migration protocols.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
[2] Wang Dongsheng, Zheng Weimin, Pei Dan. ChaRM: a Checkpoint-based Rollback Recovery and Migration System. Journal of Software, January, 1999.
 
3
[3] M. Rasit Eskieioglu. Design Issues of Process Migration Facilities in Distributed Systems. IEEE Technical Committee on Operating Systems Newsletter, 1989, 4(2):3-13.
 
4
[4] Jeremy Casas, Dan L. Clark, et al. MPVM: A Migration Transparent Version of PVM. Computing Systems, 1995, 8(2):171-216.
 
5
[5] J. Litzkow, et al. Condor -- A Hunter of Idle Workstations. In: Proc. of the 8th IEEE Intl. Conf. on Distributed Computing Systems. Los Alamitos, CA:IEEE CS Press, 1988.104-111.
 
6
[6] T. Tannenbaum and M. Litzkow. The Condor Distributed Processing System. Dr. Dobb's Journal, 1995, (2):40-48.
 
7
[7] James S. Plank, Micah Beck, Gerry Kingsley, and Kai Li. Libckpt: Transparent checkpointing under Unix. In Proceedings of the 1995 USENIX Technical Conference, pages 213-224, January 1995.
 
8
 
9
[9] Stellner and J. Pruyne. Resource Management and Checkpointing for PVM. In: Proc. 2nd Europe PVM User Group Meeting. Lyon :Editions Hermes, 1995:31-136.
 
10
[10] Ju Jiubin, Wei Xiaohui, Xu Gaochao et al. DPVM: an enhanced PVM supporting task migration and queuing, Chinese Journal of Computers, 1997, 20(10):872-877.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Pei Dan: colleagues
Wang Dongsheng: colleagues
Zhang Youhui: colleagues
Shen Meiming: colleagues